Your landing page’s weakest score is Value props.
How LMArena ranks
66Growth scoreupdated
category scores
category scoresShowHide
Value props
44PoorTitle, subtitle, hero — do they sell the product's true value?
LMArena’s headline vague
Experience the frontier
Working
- Zero-friction prompt box shows product live
- "Battle" toggle hints at the compare mechanic
- Clean fold keeps focus on trying it
Could improve
- Headline could fit any AI product
- No subhead explaining what Arena is
- No numbers, proof, or model names shown
Trust
52FairProof that the product is real, competent, and safe to try.
| Trust read | |
|---|---|
| LMArena | Live "Ask anything…" prompt box with Battle/Auto mode controls showing real product UI |
| Quote cards from verified AI leaders (Sam Altman, Demis Hassabis, Sundar Pichai, Elon Musk) citing ARC-AGI results, e.g. | |
| "Trusted by leading publications and institutions" logo strip (Our World in Data, DSIT, Government of the Netherlands, N | |
| "Non-public information and model access provided by:" with Anthropic, Google DeepMind, Meta, and OpenAI logos on the Fr | |
| Live benchmark charts ("Intelligence", "Speed", "Cost per Task") comparing named models with specific scores | |
| "Join 33M+ builders, researchers, and labs" usage stat in the hero subhead |
Information hierarchy
72FairDoes the design help or inhibit what the page is trying to say?
What works
What to improve
Mobile web
78FairThe phone experience as a first-class citizen.
What works
What to improve
CTA
82StrongCopy, size, verb, cost-feel — does the primary CTA earn the click?
How LMArena compares
Recommended rewrites