Your landing page’s weakest score is CTA.
How Epoch AI (FrontierMath / Benchmarks) ranks
- 1.
Epoch AI (FrontierMath / Benchmarks)76
- 2.
ARC Prize Foundation76
- 3.
METR73
- 4.
Kaggle Competitions72
- 5.
LMArena66
- 6.
Artificial Analysis65
76Growth scoreupdated
category scores
category scoresShowHide
CTA
68FairCopy, size, verb, cost-feel — does the primary CTA earn the click?
Problems
- 5 words — too long for one fixation
- low-contrast mint pill, weak footprint
- competes with '+' icons on stat cards
Information hierarchy
76FairDoes the design help or inhibit what the page is trying to say?
1234- Truncated third stat card — The 'Training compute' card is cut off at the viewport edge with no visible caption end, signaling a carousel that hides content and adds interaction cost.
- Carousel arrow controls — The prev/next arrows sit far right at faint gray weight, so the paging mechanism for the stat cards is easy to miss entirely.
- Card plus buttons — Each card's black '+' button is the highest-contrast element in the fold, outweighing the mint primary CTA and splitting the click path three ways.
- Clipped section headline — The next section's headline crosses the fold half-rendered, creating a stray text fragment that competes with the logo strip.
Value props
76FairTitle, subtitle, hero — do they sell the product's true value?
Epoch AI (FrontierMath / Benchmarks)’s headline
Investigating the trajectory of AI for the benefit of society.
Working
Could improve
Mobile web
78FairThe phone experience as a first-class citizen.
What works
What to improve
Trust
82StrongProof that the product is real, competent, and safe to try.
How Epoch AI (FrontierMath / Benchmarks) compares
Trust read