Artificial Analysishttps://artificialanalysis.ai/

Your landing page’s weakest score is CTA.

How Artificial Analysis ranks

  1. 1.ARC Prize Foundation76
  2. 2.Epoch AI (FrontierMath / Benchmarks)76
  3. 3.METR73
  4. 4.Kaggle Competitions72
  5. 5.LMArena66
  6. 6.Artificial Analysis65
Fix CTA
65Growth scoreupdated

category scores

CTA48Information hierarchy62
category scoresShowHide
CTA48Information hierarchy62

CTA

48Poor

Copy, size, verb, cost-feel — does the primary CTA earn the click?

Artificial Analysis
LMArenain-product action
ARC Prize Foundation
Epoch AI (FrontierMath / Benchmarks)
Kaggle Competitions
METR

Problems

  • no hero CTA at all
  • no action verb — reads as a label
  • 'Premium' signals cost, not value
  • nav-pill size, easy to miss

Information hierarchy

62Fair

Does the design help or inhibit what the page is trying to say?

Information hierarchy annotations on the desktop capture123
  1. Top navigation row — Eight nav items plus search, share, and two account buttons — a dozen exits compete before any primary action is offered.
  2. Update cards column — Two same-weight 'UPDATE' cards with external-link icons pull attention off the headline and lead away from the page's core content.
  3. Chart axis labels — Rotated, truncated model names under all three charts are illegible at fold size, weakening the data-first value pitch.

Mobile web

68Fair

The phone experience as a first-class citizen.

Artificial Analysis mobile capture for Mobile web

What works

What to improve

Trust

72Fair

Proof that the product is real, competent, and safe to try.

Artificial Analysis desktop capture for Trust

How Artificial Analysis compares

Trust read

Value props

76Fair

Title, subtitle, hero — do they sell the product's true value?

Artificial Analysis’s headlineIndependent analysis of AIUnderstand the AI landscape to choose the best model and provider for your use case

Working

Could improve