Poth LabsYC S26 landing page report.
← Back to YC S26

Your landing page’s weakest score is Trust.

Fix Trust

Score over time

8070605040Sprig 73 on Jun 14 (Wayback)Sprig 70 on Jun 29 (Wayback)Sprig 70 on Jul 9 (Wayback)Sprig 73 on Jul 25 (Wayback)Sprig 72 on Aug 11 (Wayback)Sprig 71 on Sep 4 (Wayback)Sprig 73 on Sep 22 (Live)Refiner 66 on Apr 13 (Wayback)Refiner 66 on May 17 (Wayback)Refiner 66 on Jun 2 (Wayback)Refiner 66 on Aug 9 (Wayback)Refiner 68 on Aug 29 (Wayback)Refiner 69 on Sep 22 (Live)Survicate 65 on May 19 (Wayback)Survicate 51 on Jun 15 (Wayback)Survicate 68 on Jun 22 (Wayback)Survicate 68 on Jul 12 (Wayback)Survicate 69 on Aug 3 (Wayback)Survicate 69 on Aug 29 (Wayback)Survicate 71 on Sep 22 (Live)Userpilot 70 on Apr 28 (Wayback)Userpilot 68 on May 17 (Wayback)Userpilot 75 on Jun 15 (Wayback)Userpilot 74 on Jun 22 (Wayback)Userpilot 73 on Jul 19 (Wayback)Userpilot 74 on Aug 9 (Wayback)Userpilot 70 on Sep 20 (Live)Wynter 72 on Apr 10 (Wayback)Wynter 75 on Jun 14 (Wayback)Wynter 76 on Jun 22 (Wayback)Wynter 73 on Sep 11 (Wayback)Wynter 71 on Sep 22 (Live)Poth Labs 75 on Sep 20 (Live)Sep 20

Trust

64Fair

Proof that the product is real, competent, and safe to try.

Poth Labs
Sprig
Trust read
Poth Labs"Trusted by teams at" logo strip (inkle, Sol, Composio, UnCircuit, Illume)
SprigCustomer logo row: Microsoft, Figma, DoorDash, Clay, Notion, Ramp (mobile fold)
RefinerIn-product NPS survey widget mockup ("How likely are you to recommend our service to a friend or a colleague?") with 0–1
Survicate4,7/5 star rating badge above the hero headline
UserpilotFeature tab bar listing "AI Data Analytics / AI Feedback Analysis / AI User Engagement"
Wynterimplicit context Wynter may benefit from pre-existing familiarity among its target audience.

Mobile web

72Fair

The phone experience as a first-class citizen.

Mobile web annotations on the mobile capture123
  1. Chat demo card — Tall widget pushes 'Connect Poth Labs's data free' below the first mobile viewport.
  2. Clipped chat bubble — First message is cut off at the card's top edge, making the demo look broken.
  3. Empty input field — Blank text box with a lone cursor reads as a stalled state, not a live demo.

Information hierarchy

78Fair

Does the design help or inhibit what the page is trying to say?

Information hierarchy annotations on the desktop capture1234
  1. Start Free nav button — Same orange weight as the hero CTA, splitting the primary action into two competing targets.
  2. Nav link row — Five items plus dropdowns, Pricing, and Book a Demo stack eight exits before the visitor reaches the headline.
  3. CSV template link — An orange hyperlink inside the demo card invites a click away mid-story, before the CTA below it.
  4. Book a demo button — Secondary CTA sits at near-equal size beside the primary, diluting the single-action scan path.

CTA

78Fair

Copy, size, verb, cost-feel — does the primary CTA earn the click?

Poth Labs
Wynter
Survicate

Problems

  • header says 'Start Free' instead
  • 4 words, one over ideal
  • demo input competes, bare arrow submit

Value props

82Strong

Title, subtitle, hero — do they sell the product's true value?

Poth Labs’s headline sellsWhen your data can't answer, Poth asks.Poth finds the question your evidence cannot settle, asks the customers who can, and keeps the answer on the account.

Working

  • Headline states the actual mechanism, not a buzzword
  • Hero demo shows a real question on a real account
  • Subhead spells out the find-ask-keep loop concretely

Could improve

  • No numbers or quantified outcome anywhere in fold
  • Payoff for the buyer is implied, never named
  • 'keeps the answer on the account' needs unpacking

Competitors

inferred from product, audience, and value prop