tldraw (computer/make)https://tldraw.com/

Your landing page’s weakest score is Value props.

How tldraw (computer/make) ranks

  1. 1.pen.dev74
  2. 2.Onlook70
  3. 3.Paper70
  4. 4.Figma (Dev Mode / Make)64
  5. 5.tldraw (computer/make)61
Fix Value props
61Growth scoreupdated

category scores

Value props15Information hierarchy62
category scoresShowHide
Value props15Information hierarchy62

Value props

15Poor

Title, subtitle, hero — do they sell the product's true value?

Working

  • Live canvas shows the product itself
  • Zero-friction: usable before sign-in
  • SDK link hints at developer offering

Could improve

  • No headline or value statement at all
  • SDK pitch buried in tiny corner banner
  • Nothing tells new visitors what tldraw is

Information hierarchy

62Fair

Does the design help or inhibit what the page is trying to say?

Information hierarchy annotations on the desktop capture123
  1. Expanded style panel — Opens by default with ~20 unlabeled swatches and toggles, front-loading complexity before the visitor has drawn anything.
  2. Sign in to share — The only styled CTA offers no context for a first-time visitor and competes with nothing that explains the product.
  3. Build with SDK banner — Dashed developer banner in the corner splits the fold's action between end users and SDK buyers with equal ambiguity.

Trust

62Fair

Proof that the product is real, competent, and safe to try.

tldraw (computer/make) desktop capture for Trust

How tldraw (computer/make) compares

Trust read

Mobile web

78Fair

The phone experience as a first-class citizen.

tldraw (computer/make) mobile capture for Mobile web

What works

What to improve

CTA

86Strong

Copy, size, verb, cost-feel — does the primary CTA earn the click?

How tldraw (computer/make) compares

Recommended rewrites