Paperhttps://paper.design/

Your landing page’s weakest score is Trust.

How Paper ranks

  1. 1.pen.dev74
  2. 2.Paper70
  3. 3.Onlook70
  4. 4.Figma (Dev Mode / Make)64
  5. 5.tldraw (computer/make)61
Fix Trust
70Growth scoreupdated

category scores

Trust58Mobile web68
category scoresShowHide
Trust58Mobile web68

Trust

58Fair

Proof that the product is real, competent, and safe to try.

Paper
pen.dev
Onlook
Trust read
PaperReal product UI screenshot showing the canvas editor with a terminal overlay of agent MCP commands ("paper — create_artb
pen.dev"Backed by a16z speedrun" badge above the hero headline
OnlookGitHub star count "26.6k" shown in the navigation bar
tldraw (computer/make)implicit context tldraw (computer/make) may benefit from pre-existing familiarity among its target audience.
Figma (Dev Mode / Make)implicit context Figma (Dev Mode / Make) may benefit from pre-existing familiarity among its target audience.

Mobile web

68Fair

The phone experience as a first-class citizen.

Mobile web annotations on the mobile capture123
  1. Oversized wrapping subhead — Wraps into five cramped lines and pushes the primary CTA to the fold's edge.
  2. download Paper button — Half-width desktop proportions instead of a thumb-friendly full-bleed tap target.
  3. Terminal log panel — Raw MCP command text is illegible noise on a phone and adds no story.

CTA

72Fair

Copy, size, verb, cost-feel — does the primary CTA earn the click?

Paper

How Paper compares

Recommended rewrites

Value props

72Fair

Title, subtitle, hero — do they sell the product's true value?

Paper’s headlinedesign incredible the connected canvas for teams shipping with agentsPaper connects your teams, agents, code, and data on a single design space built on web standards, so nothing gets lost in translation

Working

Could improve

Information hierarchy

82Strong

Does the design help or inhibit what the page is trying to say?

Paper desktop capture for Information hierarchy

What works

What to improve