Your landing page’s weakest score is Trust.
How Figma (Dev Mode / Make) ranks
- 1.
pen.dev74
- 2.
Onlook70
- 3.
Paper70
- 4.
Figma (Dev Mode / Make)64
- 5.
tldraw (computer/make)61
category scores
category scoresShowHide
Trust
48PoorProof that the product is real, competent, and safe to try.



| Trust read | |
|---|---|
| Figma (Dev Mode / Make) | implicit context Figma (Dev Mode / Make) may benefit from pre-existing familiarity among its target audience. |
| "Backed by a16z speedrun" badge above the hero headline | |
| GitHub star count "26.6k" shown in the navigation bar | |
| implicit context tldraw (computer/make) may benefit from pre-existing familiarity among its target audience. | |
| Real product UI screenshot showing the canvas editor with a terminal overlay of agent MCP commands ("paper — create_artb |
Value props
58FairTitle, subtitle, hero — do they sell the product's true value?
The intelligent canvas for infinite creativity
Working
- Signals AI-forward positioning via 'intelligent'
- Hero collage shows real design output
- Short, confident, memorable phrasing
Could improve
- No subhead — zero product specifics
- 'Infinite creativity' fits any creative tool
- No outcome, numbers, or proof points
Mobile web
62FairThe phone experience as a first-class citizen.

What works
What to improve
Information hierarchy
76FairDoes the design help or inhibit what the page is trying to say?

What works
What to improve
CTA
76FairCopy, size, verb, cost-feel — does the primary CTA earn the click?

How Figma (Dev Mode / Make) compares
Recommended rewrites
