Your landing page’s weakest score is Trust.
How OddsShopper ranks
- 1.
Unabated76
- 2.
Outlier70
- 3.
OddsJam69
- 4.
Bron66
- 5.
OddsShopper60
- 6.
BettingPros55
60Growth scoreupdated
category scores
category scoresShowHide
Trust
48PoorProof that the product is real, competent, and safe to try.
| Trust read | |
|---|---|
| OddsShopper | Phone mockups showing real product UI with player prop lines (e.g. "Nikola Jokic (DEN)") and a Tails picks feed |
| Live pick card showing "Malik Nabers — Over 59.5 receiving yards" with +5.0% EDGE, −122 FAIR, +100 BEST across 5 BOOKS | |
| "@The_Arbitron · Verified user · Live Arbitrage Tool" profit calendar showing "+$32,185" net profit | |
| Detailed real product UI screenshots showing 'Thunder @ Spurs' matchup stats and player prop charts | |
| "67% of users are tailing this pick, with 22 of 33 bets on this side" — live pick-tailing stat in the feed | |
| "Featured in:" press logo bar with The Athletic, ESPN, The Philadelphia Inquirer, MasterClass, The Washington Post, Roll |
Value props
54FairTitle, subtitle, hero — do they sell the product's true value?
OddsShopper’s headline vague
All Paths To Profit Begin Here
Numbers in your hands. Legends at your back. One home.
Working
- 'Profit' hits the core bettor motivation
- Hero mockups show real +EV picks in-product
- Dual CTAs split tools vs. expert picks cleanly
Could improve
- Headline could fit any betting product
- Subhead adds mood, not specifics
- No numbers, proof points, or EV stats
CTA
62FairCopy, size, verb, cost-feel — does the primary CTA earn the click?
How OddsShopper compares
Recommended rewrites
Mobile web
64FairThe phone experience as a first-class citizen.
What works
What to improve
Information hierarchy
72FairDoes the design help or inhibit what the page is trying to say?
What works
What to improve