Your landing page’s weakest score is Information hierarchy.
How LLM Stats ranks
category scores
category scoresShowHide
Information hierarchy
56FairDoes the design help or inhibit what the page is trying to say?
1234- Sub-nav category strip — 14+ same-weight links (Coding, Writing, Math, Research…) form a dense exit row before the headline can land.
- Six-stat superlative row — Six equal-weight stat blocks compete at once; no single insight leads, so the eye ping-pongs instead of scanning.
- Open Superagent banner — The most button-styled element in the fold promotes a different product, outranking any on-page primary action.
- Four Best-AI cards — Card row duplicates the sub-nav categories, adding a fourth competing band before the actual leaderboard table appears.
CTA
62FairCopy, size, verb, cost-feel — does the primary CTA earn the click?





Problems
- buried in thin promo banner
- points away from core product
- no dominant hero CTA
- 'free' lives in banner, not button
Mobile web
62FairThe phone experience as a first-class citizen.

What works
What to improve
Trust
68FairProof that the product is real, competent, and safe to try.

How LLM Stats compares
Trust read
Value props
82StrongTitle, subtitle, hero — do they sell the product's true value?
AI Leaderboard — Rankings for 300+ Top AI Models by Intelligence, Speed & Price
Independent rankings of GPT, Claude, Gemini, Llama, DeepSeek and 300+ AI models — composite LLM Stats Score, updated continuously from public benchmarks and live API metrics. See the full LLM Leaderboard for complete LLM rankings with advan
Working
Could improve
