Your landing page’s weakest score is Trust.
How GhostEye ranks
58Growth scoreupdated
category scores
category scoresShowHide
Trust
38PoorProof that the product is real, competent, and safe to try.
| Trust read | |
|---|---|
| GhostEye | No visible trust signal identified. |
| Illustrated threat-detection diagram with labeled attack vectors ("DOP-42 VOICEMAIL", "DOP-25 EMAIL", "DOP-23 MESSENGER" | |
| implicit context ZeroFox may benefit from pre-existing familiarity among its target audience. | |
| Nora chat widget claim: "taking down phishing sites quickly, often within 33 minutes" | |
| "NEW! Fraudulent Ads Monitoring, Inside Your Platform" announcement link | |
| Frost & Sullivan research banner: "Research: why fraud prevention must start before login" |
Value props
52FairTitle, subtitle, hero — do they sell the product's true value?
GhostEye’s headline vague
Stop social engineering attacks.
Working
- Names a real, urgent security outcome
- Punchy, five words, instantly readable
- Speaks the buyer's problem language
Could improve
- No subhead explaining how it works
- Zero numbers or proof points in fold
- Hero visual decorates, shows no product
CTA
62FairCopy, size, verb, cost-feel — does the primary CTA earn the click?
How GhostEye compares
Recommended rewrites
Mobile web
64FairThe phone experience as a first-class citizen.
What works
What to improve
Information hierarchy
72FairDoes the design help or inhibit what the page is trying to say?
What works
What to improve