Your landing page’s weakest score is Trust.
How Forum ranks
category scores
category scoresShowHide
Trust
35PoorProof that the product is real, competent, and safe to try.




| Trust read | |
|---|---|
| Forum | No visible trust signal identified. |
| Live market card showing "$11,050,553 vol" with a real-time price chart for WAS Commanders vs DAL Cowboys | |
| Live market volume figures — "$7M Vol." on the NATO x Russia market and Hot Topics showing "$614K today" traded | |
| Live market chart "Will crypto regulation be enacted in 2026?" with real-time price history and 192-market listing | |
| Live market listings with real trader counts and volumes, e.g. "Will Republicans win the Senate in the 2026 elections?" | |
| No visible trust signal identified. |
Value props
58FairTitle, subtitle, hero — do they sell the product's true value?
Trade on what's trending.
Markets built on views, searches, and streams.
Working
- Names the core action: trading
- Subhead names novel assets: views, searches, streams
- Short, punchy, memorable rhythm
Could improve
- No example market or number to make it concrete
- Hero shows zero product — pure decoration
- No emotional hook: edge, thrill, being early
CTA
68FairCopy, size, verb, cost-feel — does the primary CTA earn the click?

How Forum compares
Recommended rewrites
Information hierarchy
76FairDoes the design help or inhibit what the page is trying to say?

What works
What to improve
Mobile web
84StrongThe phone experience as a first-class citizen.

What works
What to improve
