Your landing page’s weakest score is Trust.
How Buildxact ranks
59Growth scoreupdated
category scores
category scoresShowHide
Trust
50FairProof that the product is real, competent, and safe to try.
| Trust read | |
|---|---|
| Buildxact | Hero photo of the Buildxact app running on a phone, showing a real estimate screen with 'buildxact.com' and invoice acti |
| "Sem spam. Avisamos-te assim que abrirmos o acesso." reassurance micro-copy under the waitlist CTA | |
| Stat band with named customers: "5× Estimating speed — Mesa Custom Homes", "60% Less time on admin — Mangino Home Improv | |
| Trusted by 50k+ contractors for over 20 years | |
| "Export to" integration badges for Xero, Fergus, simPRO and AroFlo in the hero product graphic | |
| Real Countfire product screenshot showing the takeoff UI counting symbols on an electrical drawing (A 125, AE 55, BE 64, |
Value props
52FairTitle, subtitle, hero — do they sell the product's true value?
Buildxact’s headline vague
A Better Way to Build Starts Here
Total Job Management Designed for Residential Builders
Working
- Eyebrow names audience: residential builders
- Desktop hero shows the actual app in use
- Category named: total job management
Could improve
- H1 is a slogan with no concrete value
- Zero numbers or proof points in fold
- No emotional hook — no pain or relief named
Mobile web
62FairThe phone experience as a first-class citizen.
What works
What to improve
CTA
63FairCopy, size, verb, cost-feel — does the primary CTA earn the click?
How Buildxact compares
Recommended rewrites
Information hierarchy
70FairDoes the design help or inhibit what the page is trying to say?
What works
What to improve