PranaYC W26 landing page report.
← Back to YC W26

Your landing page’s weakest score is Trust.

Fix Trust

Score over time

908070605040K Health 65 on May 27 (Wayback)K Health 66 on Jun 7 (Wayback)K Health 63 on Jun 17 (Wayback)K Health 49 on Jul 16 (Wayback)K Health 69 on Aug 11 (Wayback)K Health 70 on Aug 28 (Wayback)K Health 68 on Sep 20 (Live)Doctronic 81 on Jun 21 (Wayback)Doctronic 82 on Jun 30 (Wayback)Doctronic 83 on Jul 16 (Wayback)Doctronic 80 on Jul 27 (Wayback)Doctronic 79 on Aug 4 (Wayback)Doctronic 79 on Aug 13 (Wayback)Doctronic 82 on Sep 22 (Live)Ada Health 68 on May 28 (Wayback)Ada Health 68 on Jun 17 (Wayback)Ada Health 62 on Jul 25 (Wayback)Ada Health 70 on Aug 9 (Wayback)Ada Health 62 on Aug 24 (Wayback)Ada Health 62 on Sep 4 (Wayback)Ada Health 64 on Sep 20 (Live)Buoy Health 67 on Jul 17 (Wayback)Buoy Health 66 on Aug 19 (Wayback)Buoy Health 66 on Aug 31 (Wayback)Buoy Health 66 on Sep 16 (Wayback)Buoy Health 65 on Sep 22 (Live)Sesame 62 on Apr 21 (Wayback)Sesame 65 on May 5 (Wayback)Sesame 78 on Jul 26 (Wayback)Sesame 74 on Aug 12 (Wayback)Sesame 77 on Aug 25 (Wayback)Sesame 77 on Sep 5 (Wayback)Sesame 74 on Sep 22 (Live)Prana 74 on Sep 22 (Live)Sep 22

Trust

48Poor

Proof that the product is real, competent, and safe to try.

Prana
Sesame
K Health
Doctronic
Trust read
Prana"HIPAA secure" badge with "No subscription" and "$39 per doctor visit" trust strip
K Health"We Partner With" logo strip: Mayo Clinic, Cedars Sinai, Northwell Health, Penn Medicine, Hartford HealthCare, Hackensac
DoctronicTrustpilot rating "Excellent 4.5 out of 5"
Ada HealthHeadline claim "optimized by clinicians"
Buoy HealthNo visible trust signal identified.
Sesame"4.5 on Trustpilot" rating badge above the headline

Value props

72Fair

Title, subtitle, hero — do they sell the product's true value?

Prana’s headline undersellsWhat can we help you with?Chat with your private AI doctor — free. See a real one for a flat $39 visit whenever you need.

Working

  • Flat $39 price is concrete and bolded
  • Free AI chat lowers entry barrier
  • Chips make scope of care tangible

Could improve

  • H1 carries no value — pure prompt
  • No emotional hook (skip the waiting room)
  • No social proof or visit count

Information hierarchy

82Strong

Does the design help or inhibit what the page is trying to say?

Information hierarchy annotations on the desktop capture123
  1. Pale submit arrow button — The only action control is a small low-contrast icon with no label; visitors can miss how to start.
  2. Ten equal-weight chips — All intent chips share the same size and styling as each other and near the input, splitting attention across eleven targets.
  3. Footer links in fold — Two rows of footer links (Blog, Compare, Terms) creep into the first viewport and add exit paths.

CTA

84Strong

Copy, size, verb, cost-feel — does the primary CTA earn the click?

Pranain-product action
Doctronicin-product action

Problems

  • icon-only submit, no label
  • 'free' not on the CTA itself
  • placeholder is long, three clauses

Mobile web

84Strong

The phone experience as a first-class citizen.

Mobile web annotations on the mobile capture123
  1. Press Enter microcopy — Desktop-only instruction — phones have no Enter key, confusing the start action.
  2. Submit arrow button — Unlabeled icon is the only submit affordance; a labeled full-width button would convert better.
  3. Quick-pick chip stack — Nine chips stack into seven rows, stretching the page and diluting the single chat action.