Forge AutomationYC W25 landing page report.
← Back to YC W25

Your landing page’s weakest score is Trust.

How Forge Automation ranks

  1. 1.Hubs80
  2. 2.Protolabs74
  3. 3.RapidDirect74
  4. 4.Forge Automation72
  5. 5.Fictiv70
Fix Trust

Score over time

9080706050Protolabs 76 on Jun 6 (Wayback)Protolabs 73 on Jun 13 (Wayback)Protolabs 74 on Jun 25 (Wayback)Protolabs 76 on Jul 13 (Wayback)Protolabs 75 on Aug 1 (Wayback)Protolabs 76 on Sep 7 (Wayback)Protolabs 74 on Sep 20 (Live)Fictiv 65 on May 6 (Wayback)Fictiv 61 on May 17 (Wayback)Fictiv 66 on May 28 (Wayback)Fictiv 69 on Jun 14 (Wayback)Fictiv 70 on Jun 25 (Wayback)Fictiv 66 on Jul 28 (Wayback)Fictiv 70 on Sep 20 (Live)Hubs 79 on May 28 (Wayback)Hubs 81 on Jun 13 (Wayback)Hubs 81 on Jun 23 (Wayback)Hubs 81 on Jul 17 (Wayback)Hubs 79 on Jul 28 (Wayback)Hubs 79 on Sep 15 (Wayback)Hubs 80 on Sep 20 (Live)RapidDirect 70 on May 28 (Wayback)RapidDirect 69 on Jun 13 (Wayback)RapidDirect 69 on Jul 8 (Wayback)RapidDirect 70 on Jul 25 (Wayback)RapidDirect 74 on Aug 29 (Wayback)RapidDirect 75 on Sep 6 (Wayback)RapidDirect 74 on Sep 20 (Live)Forge Automation 72 on Sep 23 (Live)Sep 23

Trust

62Fair

Proof that the product is real, competent, and safe to try.

Forge Automation
Hubs
RapidDirect
Protolabs
Trust read
Forge Automation"Trusted by engineers building" logo band with gecko, lumafield, and revolve surgical
ProtolabsCustomer logo strip: Blue Origin, John Deere, Medtronic, Polaris, Sonos under "Innovative Companies We Support"
FictivNo visible trust signal identified.
HubsCustomer logo strip (Intel, Audi, NASA, HP) captioned "Join thousands of companies using Protolabs Network"
RapidDirectCustomer logo strip (Nikon, Toyota, Festo, Microsoft, Emerson) placed directly above the Get Instant Quote CTA

Mobile web

64Fair

The phone experience as a first-class citizen.

Mobile web annotations on the mobile capture123
  1. Desktop redirect email form — "Our platform works best on desktop" plus Email/Send form admits the mobile funnel is broken and splits attention from Upload a Part.
  2. Send button — A second full-width dark button styled identically to Upload a Part creates two competing primary actions in one viewport.
  3. Hero headline — "Forge Makes Forge Automation's CNC Parts FAST" wraps to two oversized lines and pushes the benefit bullets and CTA down the fold.

Information hierarchy

78Fair

Does the design help or inhibit what the page is trying to say?

Information hierarchy annotations on the desktop capture123
  1. Upload a Part button — Dark navy on muted gray photo gives weak contrast; the primary CTA doesn't pop within one second
  2. Login button — Styled at the same navy weight as the primary CTA, competing for the first click
  3. Trusted by tagline — Stray cursor pipe after 'Drone Delivery Systems|' makes the rotating text look broken

CTA

78Fair

Copy, size, verb, cost-feel — does the primary CTA earn the click?

Forge Automation
RapidDirect

Problems

  • desktop button small vs headline
  • same color as nav Login button
  • no payoff (instant quote) in label

Value props

80Strong

Title, subtitle, hero — do they sell the product's true value?

Forge Automation’s headline sellsCNC Parts in as fast as 1 dayForge Automation makes your CNC parts FAST

Working

  • Hard speed number in the headline
  • Bullets add shipping and pricing specifics
  • Hero photo shows real machined parts

Could improve

  • Subhead just restates the headline
  • No material, tolerance, or quote-flow detail
  • Mobile drops the 1-day speed claim

Competitors

inferred from product, audience, and value prop