InsurfYC S26 landing page report.
← Back to YC S26

Score over time

908070605040Claimable 78 on Apr 11 (Wayback)Claimable 76 on May 7 (Wayback)Claimable 78 on May 19 (Wayback)Claimable 76 on Jun 27 (Wayback)Claimable 78 on Aug 21 (Wayback)Claimable 75 on Sep 20 (Live)Fight Health Insurance 71 on May 9 (Wayback)Fight Health Insurance 72 on May 17 (Wayback)Fight Health Insurance 71 on Jun 24 (Wayback)Fight Health Insurance 70 on Sep 20 (Live)Counterforce Health 80 on Apr 16 (Wayback)Counterforce Health 81 on Jun 14 (Wayback)Counterforce Health 82 on Sep 20 (Live)Take Command Health 58 on Apr 22 (Wayback)Take Command Health 53 on Apr 29 (Wayback)Take Command Health 57 on May 18 (Wayback)Take Command Health 64 on Sep 20 (Live)Insurf 68 on Sep 20 (Live)Sep 20

Trust

44Poor

Proof that the product is real, competent, and safe to try.

Insurf
Counterforce Health
Claimable
Fight Health Insurance
Take Command Health
Trust read
Insurf"BACKED BY Y COMBINATOR" badge above the hero logo
Claimable"Our Work and Stories Covered In:" press bar with The New York Times, Bloomberg, POLITICO, and TIME logos
Fight Health Insurance"10,000+ appeals generated" badge beneath the hero CTA
Counterforce Health"Made possible through grants from the NIH and University of Pennsylvania." beneath the hero CTA
Take Command HealthReal product dashboard screenshot showing balances ($1,800.00, $405.10) and household enrollment UI

Value props

72Fair

Title, subtitle, hero — do they sell the product's true value?

Insurf’s headline sellsWe find people and companies the plan that costs the least. We fight the denials that cost the most.

Working

  • Names two concrete outcomes
  • Least/most parallelism is memorable
  • Audience links clarify who it's for

Could improve

  • No numbers or proof of savings
  • No subhead adds specifics
  • Hero art decorates, doesn't demo

Mobile web

72Fair

The phone experience as a first-class citizen.

Mobile web annotations on the mobile capture123
  1. Book a demo button — Two-thirds-width pill instead of a full-bleed thumb target; same issue on 'Run the free audit' below it.
  2. Hexagon logo mark — Oversized decorative mark eats vertical space and pushes the primary CTA toward the bottom of the fold.
  3. Audience link row — Three underlined links wrap into an uneven two-row stack, adding competing taps above the CTAs.

Information hierarchy

76Fair

Does the design help or inhibit what the page is trying to say?

Information hierarchy annotations on the desktop capture123
  1. Three audience links — 'for companies', 'for families & individuals', 'for clinics' sit at equal weight above the CTAs, splitting attention three ways before the primary action.
  2. Run the free audit — Secondary button matches 'Book a demo' in size and shape, so the fold reads as two co-equal actions instead of one primary.
  3. Headline serves two audiences — One sentence pitches both cost-saving plans and denial-fighting, forcing every visitor to parse which half applies to them.

CTA

76Fair

Copy, size, verb, cost-feel — does the primary CTA earn the click?

Insurf
Counterforce Health
Claimable

Problems

  • demo click feels costly
  • free offer demoted to secondary
  • no 'free' despite free audit