GhostEyeYC S25 landing page report.
← Back to YC S25
GhostEyehttps://ghosteye.ai/

Your landing page’s weakest score is Trust.

How GhostEye ranks

  1. 1.Doppel64
  2. 2.Netcraft64
  3. 3.GhostEye58
  4. 4.Memcyco56
  5. 5.ZeroFox42
  6. 6.Bolster16
Fix Trust
58Growth scoreupdated

category scores

Trust38Value props52CTA62Mobile web64Information hierarchy72
category scoresShowHide
Trust38Value props52CTA62Mobile web64Information hierarchy72

Score over time

806040200Doppel 68 on May 4 (Wayback)Doppel 69 on May 18 (Wayback)Doppel 64 on Jun 8 (Wayback)Doppel 65 on Jun 22 (Wayback)Doppel 65 on Jul 14 (Wayback)Doppel 66 on Aug 25 (Wayback)Doppel 64 on Sep 22 (Live)ZeroFox 62 on Jun 11 (Wayback)ZeroFox 59 on Jul 1 (Wayback)ZeroFox 63 on Jul 10 (Wayback)ZeroFox 45 on Aug 4 (Wayback)ZeroFox 48 on Aug 22 (Wayback)ZeroFox 47 on Sep 9 (Wayback)ZeroFox 42 on Sep 22 (Live)Netcraft 66 on Jun 14 (Wayback)Netcraft 64 on Jun 29 (Wayback)Netcraft 65 on Jul 12 (Wayback)Netcraft 64 on Jul 26 (Wayback)Netcraft 65 on Aug 9 (Wayback)Netcraft 65 on Sep 4 (Wayback)Netcraft 64 on Sep 20 (Live)Bolster 72 on Apr 7 (Wayback)Bolster 69 on May 11 (Wayback)Bolster 16 on Sep 22 (Live)Memcyco 58 on May 5 (Wayback)Memcyco 54 on May 20 (Wayback)Memcyco 59 on Jun 12 (Wayback)Memcyco 58 on Jul 9 (Wayback)Memcyco 60 on Aug 22 (Wayback)Memcyco 56 on Sep 6 (Wayback)Memcyco 56 on Sep 22 (Live)GhostEye 58 on May 17 (Wayback)GhostEye 57 on Jun 4 (Wayback)GhostEye 58 on Sep 22 (Live)May 17Jun 4Sep 22
Past reportsShow past reportsHide past reports
  1. Sep 22, 202658LiveOverall +1 · Mobile web −12 · Trust +8Viewing
  2. Jun 4, 202657Overall −1 · Trust −8 · Information hierarchy +2View →
  3. May 17, 202658First tracked report — strongest Mobile web 76, weakest Trust 38View →

Trust

38Poor

Proof that the product is real, competent, and safe to try.

Netcraft
Memcyco
Doppel
Trust read
GhostEyeNo visible trust signal identified.
DoppelIllustrated threat-detection diagram with labeled attack vectors ("DOP-42 VOICEMAIL", "DOP-25 EMAIL", "DOP-23 MESSENGER"
ZeroFoximplicit context ZeroFox may benefit from pre-existing familiarity among its target audience.
NetcraftNora chat widget claim: "taking down phishing sites quickly, often within 33 minutes"
Bolster"NEW! Fraudulent Ads Monitoring, Inside Your Platform" announcement link
MemcycoFrost & Sullivan research banner: "Research: why fraud prevention must start before login"

Value props

52Fair

Title, subtitle, hero — do they sell the product's true value?

GhostEye’s headline vagueStop social engineering attacks.

Working

  • Names a real, urgent security outcome
  • Punchy, five words, instantly readable
  • Speaks the buyer's problem language

Could improve

  • No subhead explaining how it works
  • Zero numbers or proof points in fold
  • Hero visual decorates, shows no product

CTA

62Fair

Copy, size, verb, cost-feel — does the primary CTA earn the click?

GhostEye
Netcraft
Doppel

Problems

  • demo booking feels costly
  • nav-sized, no hero CTA
  • hero only says 'Scroll to Explore'
  • no low-friction alternative

Mobile web

64Fair

The phone experience as a first-class citizen.

Mobile web annotations on the mobile capture123
  1. Book a Demo button — Only CTA on the page is a small header pill, not a thumb-friendly full-width button in the body.
  2. Search and menu icons — Two icon buttons crowd the CTA in the top-right, splitting the header into a busy three-control cluster.
  3. Scroll to Explore cue — The fold's only body-level action is a scroll prompt, deferring conversion instead of offering a tap.

Information hierarchy

72Fair

Does the design help or inhibit what the page is trying to say?

Information hierarchy annotations on the desktop capture123
  1. Scroll to Explore cue — Occupies the prime spot below the headline, steering visitors into scrolling instead of the demo CTA.
  2. Book a Demo button — The only conversion action is a small corner button outside the centered scan path down the headline.
  3. Hero headline block — Stands alone with no subtitle explaining what GhostEye is or does, leaving the promise unresolved.

Competitors

inferred from product, audience, and value prop
#1Doppeldoppel.com64 #2Netcraftnetcraft.com64
#3GhostEye58
#4Memcycomemcyco.com56 #5ZeroFoxzerofox.com42 #6Bolsterbolster.ai16