Weavehttps://weaveos.com/

Your landing page’s weakest score is CTA.

How Weave ranks

  1. 1.Swarmia73
  2. 2.Faros AI71
  3. 3.DX68
  4. 4.Jellyfish66
  5. 5.Weave64
  6. 6.LinearB64
Fix CTA
64Growth scoreupdated

category scores

CTA58Information hierarchy62
category scoresShowHide
CTA58Information hierarchy62

CTA

58Fair

Copy, size, verb, cost-feel — does the primary CTA earn the click?

Weave
Swarmia
Jellyfish
LinearB
DX
Faros AI

Problems

  • demo booking feels costly
  • free CTA hidden on desktop fold
  • labels differ desktop vs mobile
  • no hero CTA on desktop fold

Information hierarchy

62Fair

Does the design help or inhibit what the page is trying to say?

Information hierarchy annotations on the desktop capture1234
  1. Hero mascot illustration — The yarn mascot scene occupies the entire upper half of the fold, pushing the headline and both CTAs below the visitor's first scan.
  2. Book a Demo button — The only visible desktop CTA sits at the far top-right corner, outside the centered scan path of the headline and hero.
  3. Navigation link row — Six nav items plus a GitHub star count and Sign In offer eight exit paths before the value prop is even read.
  4. Weave Research banner — An announcement link sits directly above the hero, adding one more exit path that outranks the conversion action in scan order.

Trust

62Fair

Proof that the product is real, competent, and safe to try.

Weave desktop capture for Trust

How Weave compares

Trust read

Mobile web

68Fair

The phone experience as a first-class citizen.

Weave mobile capture for Mobile web

What works

What to improve

Value props

72Fair

Title, subtitle, hero — do they sell the product's true value?

Weave’s headlineEngineering and token intelligence to optimize the SDLCWeave shows you the ROI of every AI dollar, benchmarked against thousands of engineering orgs.

Working

Could improve