Your landing page’s weakest score is Trust.
How Jellyfish ranks
- 1.
Swarmia73
- 2.
Faros AI71
- 3.
DX68
- 4.
Jellyfish66
- 5.
Weave64
- 6.
LinearB64
Trust
55FairProof that the product is real, competent, and safe to try.





| Trust read | |
|---|---|
| Jellyfish | Product dashboard screenshot showing "AI Spend" metrics: "$4,583.14 cost per month" and "737,897,142 token usage per mon |
| "Trusted by 500+ engineering organizations. Startups to Fortune 100" with Mastra and Spellbook logos | |
| implicit context LinearB may benefit from pre-existing familiarity among its target audience. | |
| Customer logo strip under "POWERING THE WORLD'S TOP COMPANIES" (Fiserv, Indeed, ABInBev, Sony) visible in the mobile cap | |
| Customer logo strip: Autodesk, "TOP 5 US BANK", Riskified, Coursera, Discord | |
| "Swarmia named as a Leader in the 2026 Gartner® Magic Quadrant™ for Developer Productivity Insight Platforms" |
Mobile web
62FairThe phone experience as a first-class citizen.
1234- Auto-opened chat message — Four-line chat bubble fires automatically and covers the product screenshot with a dead blocker.
- AI Impact Week banner — Three-line promo banner eats the top of the fold and pushes the headline and CTA down.
- Ask us chat pill — Large floating chat pill duplicates the bubble above and occupies prime bottom-thumb territory.
- Header demo button — Second "Request a Demo" in the header duplicates the hero form CTA and splits attention.
CTA
68FairCopy, size, verb, cost-feel — does the primary CTA earn the click?

How Jellyfish compares
Recommended rewrites
Information hierarchy
72FairDoes the design help or inhibit what the page is trying to say?

What works
What to improve
Value props
72FairTitle, subtitle, hero — do they sell the product's true value?
The Intelligence Platform for AI-Integrated Engineering
Jellyfish turns your developer tool data into productivity insights that help R&D drive measurable impact in the AI era.
Working
Could improve
