Your landing page’s weakest score is Trust.
How LinearB ranks
64Growth scoreupdated
category scores
category scoresShowHide
Trust
54FairProof that the product is real, competent, and safe to try.
| Trust read | |
|---|---|
| LinearB | implicit context LinearB may benefit from pre-existing familiarity among its target audience. |
| "Trusted by 500+ engineering organizations. Startups to Fortune 100" with Mastra and Spellbook logos | |
| Product dashboard screenshot showing "AI Spend" metrics: "$4,583.14 cost per month" and "737,897,142 token usage per mon | |
| Customer logo strip under "POWERING THE WORLD'S TOP COMPANIES" (Fiserv, Indeed, ABInBev, Sony) visible in the mobile cap | |
| Customer logo strip: Autodesk, "TOP 5 US BANK", Riskified, Coursera, Discord | |
| "Swarmia named as a Leader in the 2026 Gartner® Magic Quadrant™ for Developer Productivity Insight Platforms" |
Value props
62FairTitle, subtitle, hero — do they sell the product's true value?
LinearB’s headline vague
The engineering productivity platform
Turn context into outcomes and automations for AI agents, teams, and managers
Working
- Hero image demonstrates the product working
- AI Assistant prompts show real use cases
- Clear category positioning for eng leaders
Could improve
- H1 is a category label, not a benefit
- Subhead stacks abstractions like 'context'
- No numbers or proof points in the fold
Mobile web
62FairThe phone experience as a first-class citizen.
What works
What to improve
CTA
68FairCopy, size, verb, cost-feel — does the primary CTA earn the click?
How LinearB compares
Recommended rewrites
Information hierarchy
72FairDoes the design help or inhibit what the page is trying to say?
What works
What to improve