Undermindhttps://undermind.ai/

Your landing page’s weakest score is Value props.

How Undermind ranks

  1. 1.Undermind83
  2. 2.AnswerThis74
  3. 3.Elicit74
  4. 4.Scite71
  5. 5.Consensus70
Fix Value props
83Growth scoreupdated

category scores

Value props78Trust78
category scoresShowHide
Value props78Trust78

Value props

78Fair

Title, subtitle, hero — do they sell the product's true value?

Undermind’s headline sellsYour AI co-researcherUndermind finds the papers others miss, helping you start broad, go deep, and build real command of your field over time.

Working

  • "Papers others miss" hits researcher FOMO
  • Elite university logos back the claim
  • "Co-researcher" frames a partner, not a tool

Could improve

  • No numbers anywhere in the hero
  • Hero art decorates, doesn't demonstrate
  • No speed or coverage claim in the fold

Trust

78Fair

Proof that the product is real, competent, and safe to try.

Trust read
Undermind"1000+ GSK scientists use Undermind" proof card with university logo bar (MIT, Harvard, Caltech, Princeton, Berkeley, Ca
AnswerThis"Trusted by over 1 Million+ researchers" with avatar strip below the Start For Free CTA
Elicit"TRUSTED BY OVER 5 MILLION RESEARCHERS, INCLUDING AT" with B. Braun and NASA logos (mobile)
ConsensusSearch & analyze 200M+ peer reviewed research papers
Scite"Reads across 280M+ full-text scholarly articles" badge directly below the search box

Information hierarchy

86Strong

Does the design help or inhibit what the page is trying to say?

Undermind desktop capture for Information hierarchy

What works

What to improve

CTA

86Strong

Copy, size, verb, cost-feel — does the primary CTA earn the click?

Undermind

How Undermind compares

Recommended rewrites

Mobile web

88Strong

The phone experience as a first-class citizen.

Undermind mobile capture for Mobile web

What works

What to improve