AnswerThishttps://answerthis.io/

Your landing page’s weakest score is Trust.

How AnswerThis ranks

  1. 1.Undermind83
  2. 2.AnswerThis74
  3. 3.Elicit74
  4. 4.Scite71
  5. 5.Consensus70
Fix Trust
74Growth scoreupdated

category scores

Trust68Value props72
category scoresShowHide
Trust68Value props72

Trust

68Fair

Proof that the product is real, competent, and safe to try.

AnswerThis
Undermind
Trust read
AnswerThis"Trusted by over 1 Million+ researchers" with avatar strip below the Start For Free CTA
Elicit"TRUSTED BY OVER 5 MILLION RESEARCHERS, INCLUDING AT" with B. Braun and NASA logos (mobile)
ConsensusSearch & analyze 200M+ peer reviewed research papers
Scite"Reads across 280M+ full-text scholarly articles" badge directly below the search box
Undermind"1000+ GSK scientists use Undermind" proof card with university logo bar (MIT, Harvard, Caltech, Princeton, Berkeley, Ca

Value props

72Fair

Title, subtitle, hero — do they sell the product's true value?

AnswerThis’s headline undersellsScientific AI For All Verified Research WorkflowsUpload a draft or ask a question, auto evaluate citations from 300M+ papers, trials and PDFs. From Finding Gaps, to Professional Presentation to Complete Prisma / Cochrane Compliant SLRs

Working

  • 300M+ papers is concrete proof
  • Prisma/Cochrane names real outcomes
  • 1M+ researchers social proof

Could improve

  • H1 is abstract, no outcome
  • Subhead crams too many claims
  • Headline could name the user's win

Information hierarchy

74Fair

Does the design help or inhibit what the page is trying to say?

AnswerThis desktop capture for Information hierarchy

What works

What to improve

Mobile web

76Fair

The phone experience as a first-class citizen.

AnswerThis mobile capture for Mobile web

What works

What to improve

CTA

82Strong

Copy, size, verb, cost-feel — does the primary CTA earn the click?

AnswerThis

How AnswerThis compares

Recommended rewrites