Your landing page’s weakest score is Trust.
How Scite ranks
71Growth scoreupdated
category scores
category scoresShowHide
Trust
56FairProof that the product is real, competent, and safe to try.
| Trust read | |
|---|---|
| Scite | "Reads across 280M+ full-text scholarly articles" badge directly below the search box |
| "Trusted by over 1 Million+ researchers" with avatar strip below the Start For Free CTA | |
| "TRUSTED BY OVER 5 MILLION RESEARCHERS, INCLUDING AT" with B. Braun and NASA logos (mobile) | |
| Search & analyze 200M+ peer reviewed research papers | |
| "1000+ GSK scientists use Undermind" proof card with university logo bar (MIT, Harvard, Caltech, Princeton, Berkeley, Ca |
Value props
70FairTitle, subtitle, hero — do they sell the product's true value?
Scite’s headline undersells
AI for Research
Ask a question, get answers grounded in the scientific literature
Working
- Subhead names outcome and grounding
- 280M+ articles chip adds hard proof
- Search box demonstrates the product live
Could improve
- H1 is a generic category label
- Anti-hallucination edge buried in cards
- 'Trusted by Millions' lacks named logos
Mobile web
74FairThe phone experience as a first-class citizen.
What works
What to improve
Information hierarchy
78FairDoes the design help or inhibit what the page is trying to say?
What works
What to improve
CTA
79FairCopy, size, verb, cost-feel — does the primary CTA earn the click?
How Scite compares
Recommended rewrites