Your landing page’s weakest score is Trust.
How Studdy ranks
category scores
category scoresShowHide
Trust
58FairProof that the product is real, competent, and safe to try.


| Trust read | |
|---|---|
| Studdy | "Students have saved over $1.2M in tutoring costs through" headline (mobile capture) |
| Line-by-line marking demo showing "Slip: ÷4.4, not ÷44" and carried-through credit on the CO₂ problem | |
| Wall Street Journal quote: "Forget ChatGPT. These are the best AI-powered apps." | |
| "Join over 35,000 forward-thinking families. Designed for ages 5-11." beneath the hero CTA | |
| "Our students raise their predicted grades by close to a point per subject on average." | |
| Interactive solver input showing "Solve ∫ x² dx step b" with a math-token chip (mobile capture) |
Value props
72FairTitle, subtitle, hero — do they sell the product's true value?
AI Whiteboard Tutor For Studying
Upload your notes, textbooks, study guides, or hw problems. Get 1:1 help with anything, instantly
Working
- Plainly names what the product is
- Subhead gives a concrete action path
- Hero shows product actually tutoring
Could improve
- No numbers or proof in the fold
- Flat tone, no emotional payoff
- $1.2M stat buried below the fold
Information hierarchy
78FairDoes the design help or inhibit what the page is trying to say?

What works
What to improve
Mobile web
82StrongThe phone experience as a first-class citizen.

What works
What to improve
CTA
86StrongCopy, size, verb, cost-feel — does the primary CTA earn the click?

How Studdy compares
Recommended rewrites
