Your landing page’s weakest score is Trust.
How felt-study.pages.dev ranks
Trust
52FairProof that the product is real, competent, and safe to try.
| Trust read | |
|---|---|
| felt-study.pages.dev | Line-by-line marking demo showing "Slip: ÷4.4, not ÷44" and carried-through credit on the CO₂ problem |
| Wall Street Journal quote: "Forget ChatGPT. These are the best AI-powered apps." | |
| "Join over 35,000 forward-thinking families. Designed for ages 5-11." beneath the hero CTA | |
| "Our students raise their predicted grades by close to a point per subject on average." | |
| "Students have saved over $1.2M in tutoring costs through" headline (mobile capture) | |
| Interactive solver input showing "Solve ∫ x² dx step b" with a math-token chip (mobile capture) |
CTA
68FairCopy, size, verb, cost-feel — does the primary CTA earn the click?
Problems
- no 'free' despite free joining
- 'waitlist' promises delay, not value
- payoff buried in fine print
Mobile web
72FairThe phone experience as a first-class citizen.
What works
What to improve
Information hierarchy
76FairDoes the design help or inhibit what the page is trying to say?
What works
What to improve
Value props
82StrongTitle, subtitle, hero — do they sell the product's true value?
felt-study.pages.dev’s headline
Show your working. Felt marks every line, like an examiner.
AI writes the course. Fixed rules mark it. Drop in your notes or a topic and get short lessons and exercises for maths, physics, chemistry or statistics. Numeric answers are checked against the exercise's own formula, so the same answer alw
Working
Could improve