Your landing page’s weakest score is Trust.
How Rhino.Inside / ShapeDiver ranks
- 1.
Speckle69
- 2.
Rhino.Inside / ShapeDiver67
- 3.
Hypar66
- 4.
viktor.ai64
- 5.
Dasher (Autodesk Platform Services alternative) — Forma51
category scores
category scoresShowHide
Trust
48PoorProof that the product is real, competent, and safe to try.




| Trust read | |
|---|---|
| Rhino.Inside / ShapeDiver | Laptop hero image showing a real Grasshopper/Rhino-style parametric design interface in use |
| Banner: "Arup rolls out the VIKTOR AI platform across its global organisation." | |
| "Trusted by" logo wall: BSA, Flad Architects, HED, NELSON, SLAM, Stantec | |
| "Adopted by top-performing global teams" logo strip (Arup, BakerHicks, Bollinger+Grohmann, Cundall, Fast+Epp, FDB) | |
| Construction industry card showing a tablet displaying real CAD drawing software in a worker's hands |
Information hierarchy
68FairDoes the design help or inhibit what the page is trying to say?
1234- Why ShapeDiver? button — Solid-filled informational button outranks the conversion action beside it, pulling first clicks away from signup.
- Create a Free Account — The real primary CTA is a ghost outline, visually subordinate to its neighbor and to the nav's SIGN UP pill.
- Nav link row — Nine links plus TALK TO SALES and Login create eleven exits before the hero CTAs are reached.
- SIGN UP pill — Duplicates the hero's signup path at equal prominence, splitting attention between two conversion entry points.
CTA
68FairCopy, size, verb, cost-feel — does the primary CTA earn the click?

How Rhino.Inside / ShapeDiver compares
Recommended rewrites
Value props
76FairTitle, subtitle, hero — do they sell the product's true value?
Turn Your Grasshopper Files Into Online Applications.
Create powerful online tools, such as 3D product configurators, using nothing but Grasshopper.
Working
Could improve
Mobile web
76FairThe phone experience as a first-class citizen.

What works
What to improve
