Your landing page’s weakest score is Trust.

Fix Trust
76Growth scoreupdated

category scores

category scoresShowHide

Trust

58Fair

Proof that the product is real, competent, and safe to try.

Requesty
Helicone
Trust read
RequestyDetailed analytics dashboard screenshot showing "Sum of Cost by Model Over Time — $445.95" with per-model usage table (o
Quotient LabsBefore/after terminal demo showing Agent cost $60.62 → $29.79 with quality 0.931 ▲+0.08
LangDB (AI Gateway)No visible trust signal identified.
Helicone"1000+ AI teams use Helicone to build reliable products" with customer logos (together.ai, QA Wolf)
LiteLLMimplicit context LiteLLM may benefit from pre-existing familiarity among its target audience.

Information hierarchy

72Fair

Does the design help or inhibit what the page is trying to say?

Information hierarchy annotations on the desktop capture1234
  1. Nine-item navigation bar — Nine links plus three dropdowns and Sign in offer a dozen exits before the hero CTA.
  2. Speak to founders button — Sits directly beside the primary CTA at nearly equal size, splitting the action decision.
  3. Sales email link — A third conversion path under the buttons dilutes the single next step further.
  4. Duplicate Get started free — Nav CTA repeats the hero button, adding a competing white-weight element to the top bar.

Value props

76Fair

Title, subtitle, hero — do they sell the product's true value?

Requesty’s headlineThe AI Gateway for ProductionAccess 600+ models through one API with intelligent routing, real-time analytics and centralized governance.

Working

Could improve

Mobile web

84Strong

The phone experience as a first-class citizen.

Requesty mobile capture for Mobile web

What works

What to improve

CTA

88Strong

Copy, size, verb, cost-feel — does the primary CTA earn the click?

Requesty

How Requesty compares

Recommended rewrites