Your landing page’s weakest score is Trust.
How Relace ranks
category scores
category scoresShowHide
Trust
38PoorProof that the product is real, competent, and safe to try.





| Trust read | |
|---|---|
| Relace | Code snippet visual ("async function handler...") suggesting a developer-focused product |
| "Backed by Y Combinator" badge above the hero headline | |
| "OVER 22,000+ TEAMS USE GREPTILE" usage banner | |
| Video card labeled "Agentic Batch Changes — Available today" | |
| Customer logo wall showing AWS, Databricks, Groq, Gamma, and monday.com | |
| "#1 on Design Arena" claim in the Kimi K3 link |
Value props
62FairTitle, subtitle, hero — do they sell the product's true value?
Models built for coding agents
Source control with out-of-the box codebase retrieval, fast utility SLMs, and task-specific agents you can run on any repo.
Working
- Names the exact buyer: coding-agent builders
- Concrete nouns: SLMs, codebase retrieval, any repo
- No inflated abstraction — honest category claim
Could improve
- No numbers: latency, cost, accuracy absent
- Feature list, no outcome or payoff
- Hero image decorates, doesn't demonstrate
Information hierarchy
72FairDoes the design help or inhibit what the page is trying to say?

What works
What to improve
CTA
72FairCopy, size, verb, cost-feel — does the primary CTA earn the click?

How Relace compares
Recommended rewrites
Mobile web
76FairThe phone experience as a first-class citizen.

What works
What to improve
