Your landing page’s weakest score is Trust.
How Exa (Exa Code) ranks
- 1.
Exa (Exa Code)82
- 2.
Perseus71
- 3.
Greptile70
- 4.
Sourcegraph65
- 5.
Relace64
- 6.
Morph23
category scores
category scoresShowHide
Trust
78FairProof that the product is real, competent, and safe to try.
| Trust read | |
|---|---|
| Exa (Exa Code) | Customer logo wall showing AWS, Databricks, Groq, Gamma, and monday.com |
| "Backed by Y Combinator" badge above the hero headline | |
| "OVER 22,000+ TEAMS USE GREPTILE" usage banner | |
| Video card labeled "Agentic Batch Changes — Available today" | |
| Code snippet visual ("async function handler...") suggesting a developer-focused product | |
| "#1 on Design Arena" claim in the Kimi K3 link |
Information hierarchy
80StrongDoes the design help or inhibit what the page is trying to say?
1234- Sign up button — Black-filled pill matches the primary CTA's weight exactly, splitting the one-second scan between two equal actions.
- Header navigation row — Six nav links plus Contact sales stack roughly eight exits directly above the headline before the visitor reaches the value prop.
- Announcement banner — The 'Learn more' link is the first clickable element on the page and routes attention off the fold before the headline is read.
- API Playground link — External link embedded in the demo pulls engaged visitors out of the fold instead of into 'Try API for free'.
Value props
82StrongTitle, subtitle, hero — do they sell the product's true value?
Web search, built for AI agents
One API for search, crawling, and research agents
Working
Could improve
CTA
84StrongCopy, size, verb, cost-feel — does the primary CTA earn the click?

How Exa (Exa Code) compares
Recommended rewrites
Mobile web
86StrongThe phone experience as a first-class citizen.

What works
What to improve
