Your landing page’s weakest score is Information hierarchy.
How Follett (Baker & Taylor) / Innovative ranks
- 1.
Axiell66
- 2.
Ossus63
- 3.
OCLC (WorldShare)51
- 4.
SirsiDynix51
- 5.
Follett (Baker & Taylor) / Innovative49
- 6.
Ex Libris (Alma)46
category scores
category scoresShowHide
Information hierarchy
42PoorDoes the design help or inhibit what the page is trying to say?
1234- Pulse report modal — Interstitial covers the headline and hero, making the modal's "Download the report" the only readable CTA instead of the page's own message.
- Obscured hero headline — "A library ... that matt..." is truncated behind the modal and rendered in low-contrast dark green on dark, so the value prop never lands.
- Dual navigation rows — Utility bar (Contact, Support, Email Preferences) plus eight-item main nav stack twelve-plus exits above the fold.
- Awards promo banner — "Clarivate Library Awards / Learn More" adds a third competing message and exit path at the very top of the fold.
Value props
42PoorTitle, subtitle, hero — do they sell the product's true value?
A library experience that matters
For wherever and however you use your library, Innovative helps you create exciting library experiences, whether in the library or on the go.
Working
- Emotive angle: experiences 'that matter'
- Speaks to libraries, the real audience
- Values copy signals community focus
Could improve
- Modal blocks the entire hero on both views
- Headline fits any library vendor
- No product capability or number named
Mobile web
44PoorThe phone experience as a first-class citizen.

What works
What to improve
Trust
52FairProof that the product is real, competent, and safe to try.

How Follett (Baker & Taylor) / Innovative compares
Trust read
CTA
64FairCopy, size, verb, cost-feel — does the primary CTA earn the click?

How Follett (Baker & Taylor) / Innovative compares
Recommended rewrites
