Your landing page’s weakest score is Value props.
How Heap (Contentsquare) ranks
- 1.
LogRocket80
- 2.
PostHog72
- 3.
Human Behavior69
- 4.
Fullstory69
- 5.
Heap (Contentsquare)68
- 6.
June (Amplitude)37
category scores
category scoresShowHide
Value props
62FairTitle, subtitle, hero — do they sell the product's true value?
Better Insights. Faster.
Heap has joined forces with Contentsquare 🤝 Together, we automatically capture every user interaction so you always have the data you need to increase conversions, retention, and customer delight.
Working
- Subhead names autocapture differentiator
- Hero image shows real funnel product UI
- Outcomes named: conversions, retention
Could improve
- Headline is a generic abstraction
- Merger news leads the subhead
- No specific numbers in the copy
Mobile web
64FairThe phone experience as a first-class citizen.
123- Triple-decker header stack — Brand bar, three-line promo banner, and nav consume the top quarter of the viewport and push the CTA below the fold.
- Six-line subhead — Desktop-length paragraph wraps into six lines on mobile, displacing both CTAs and containing a broken tofu glyph.
- Free Trial button — Desktop-proportioned button floats small in the column instead of a thumb-friendly near-full-width tap target.
CTA
68FairCopy, size, verb, cost-feel — does the primary CTA earn the click?

How Heap (Contentsquare) compares
Recommended rewrites
Information hierarchy
72FairDoes the design help or inhibit what the page is trying to say?

What works
What to improve
Trust
72FairProof that the product is real, competent, and safe to try.

How Heap (Contentsquare) compares
Trust read
