Your landing page’s weakest score is Trust.
How Eventbrite ranks
- 1.
22273
- 2.
Meetup71
- 3.
Eventbrite64
- 4.
Timeleft60
- 5.
spark.love57
- 6.
Pie47
category scores
category scoresShowHide
Trust
48PoorProof that the product is real, competent, and safe to try.



| Trust read | |
|---|---|
| Eventbrite | "Browsing events in Cincinnati" localized event browser with All/For you/Today/This weekend filters |
| "Free to download. Optional membership. Activity and ticket costs may be separate." disclosure under the CTA | |
| App Store and Google Play download badges | |
| Candid polaroid-style photos of members at 222 nights out | |
| No visible trust signal identified. | |
| "Events near Fort Worth, TX" grid with real local event cards (e.g. Grape Fest, "Free") |
Value props
58FairTitle, subtitle, hero — do they sell the product's true value?
FROM POP BALLADS TO EMO ENCORES
Working
- Vivid, genre-specific language
- Hero photo shows a live show payoff
- CTA "Get Into Live Music" matches copy
Could improve
- Sells one category, not the platform
- No subhead stating what Eventbrite does
- Zero numbers or proof points in fold
Information hierarchy
68FairDoes the design help or inhibit what the page is trying to say?

What works
What to improve
CTA
68FairCopy, size, verb, cost-feel — does the primary CTA earn the click?

How Eventbrite compares
Recommended rewrites
Mobile web
78FairThe phone experience as a first-class citizen.

What works
What to improve
