Your landing page’s weakest score is Trust.
How Decagon ranks
category scores
category scoresShowHide
Trust
38PoorProof that the product is real, competent, and safe to try.




| Trust read | |
|---|---|
| Decagon | implicit context Decagon may benefit from pre-existing familiarity among its target audience. |
| Embedded chat demo showing Eloquent AI resolving an insurance request ("add a driver to my car insurance") | |
| Sierra Agent chat demo resolving "I don't recognize this $95 charge" and booking "Appointment booked" | |
| KAIgentic Dashboard product screenshot with agent/workflow metrics and a specific AI chat recommending savings and trave | |
| Stat bar: "100+ credit unions & community banks", "1.5M+ conversations a day", "99.99% uptime" |
Value props
68FairTitle, subtitle, hero — do they sell the product's true value?
The AI concierge for every customer
Build, optimize, and scale AI agents that treat every customer like the only one.
Working
- Concierge framing beats generic AI-support copy
- Mobile hero shows product resolving a real task
- Subhead names the buyer job: build, optimize, scale
Could improve
- No numbers, logos, or proof anywhere in the fold
- Desktop right half is empty — demo missing
- Subhead is affectless, states no outcome
Information hierarchy
72FairDoes the design help or inhibit what the page is trying to say?

What works
What to improve
CTA
72FairCopy, size, verb, cost-feel — does the primary CTA earn the click?

How Decagon compares
Recommended rewrites
Mobile web
86StrongThe phone experience as a first-class citizen.

What works
What to improve
