Your landing page’s weakest score is Trust.
How AutoSitu ranks
66Growth scoreupdated
category scores
category scoresShowHide
Trust
52FairProof that the product is real, competent, and safe to try.
| Trust read | |
|---|---|
| AutoSitu | "BACKED BY Y COMBINATOR" badge above the headline |
| Customer logo wall on mobile including Snøhetta, WATG, Carnegie Mellon University, and AECOM | |
| "Trusted every day by thousands of professional builders." strip above the customer logo row | |
| Real product screenshot of an AI-generated site plan with parking layout, color-coded unit blocks, and Amenity zone | |
| Embedded product UI showing a conversation: "What critical path scheduled activities happen during the week of August 17 | |
| 3D feasibility map demo with highlighted parcels and a data chart panel (mobile) |
Value props
62FairTitle, subtitle, hero — do they sell the product's true value?
AutoSitu’s headline vague
The first AI operating system for the built world.
Connected intelligence from feasibility to construction — bringing site feasibility, design review & QA/QC, code compliance, quantity takeoff, and scope gap analysis into one system.
Working
- Subhead names five concrete workflows
- Capability chips reinforce scope
- YC badge adds early credibility
Could improve
- Headline is a category claim, not a benefit
- No numbers or named outcomes anywhere
- Hero image decorates, never demonstrates
CTA
68FairCopy, size, verb, cost-feel — does the primary CTA earn the click?
How AutoSitu compares
Recommended rewrites
Mobile web
72FairThe phone experience as a first-class citizen.
What works
What to improve
Information hierarchy
78FairDoes the design help or inhibit what the page is trying to say?
What works
What to improve