ForemanYC W26 landing page report.
← Back to YC W26

Your landing page’s weakest score is Trust.

Fix Trust

Score over time

908070605040Houzz Pro 63 on Feb 3 (Wayback)Houzz Pro 62 on Jul 30 (Live)JobTread 61 on May 11 (Wayback)JobTread 62 on May 19 (Wayback)JobTread 64 on Jun 5 (Wayback)JobTread 63 on Jun 16 (Wayback)JobTread 60 on Jul 10 (Wayback)JobTread 62 on Jul 31 (Wayback)JobTread 67 on Sep 22 (Live)CoConstruct 46 on Apr 20 (Wayback)CoConstruct 45 on May 18 (Wayback)CoConstruct 46 on May 29 (Wayback)CoConstruct 46 on Jun 12 (Wayback)CoConstruct 53 on Sep 22 (Live)Handoff 67 on Feb 17 (Wayback)Handoff 75 on Mar 18 (Wayback)Handoff 75 on Apr 4 (Wayback)Handoff 76 on Jul 30 (Live)Togal.AI 62 on Mar 26 (Wayback)Togal.AI 61 on Apr 14 (Wayback)Togal.AI 60 on Apr 23 (Wayback)Togal.AI 60 on May 7 (Wayback)Togal.AI 62 on May 19 (Wayback)Togal.AI 62 on Jun 20 (Wayback)Togal.AI 71 on Sep 20 (Live)Foreman 76 on Apr 22 (Wayback)Foreman 69 on May 17 (Wayback)Foreman 69 on Sep 22 (Live)Apr 22May 17Sep 22
Past reportsShow past reportsHide past reports
  1. Sep 22, 202669LiveTrust +10 · Mobile web −8Viewing
  2. May 17, 202669Overall −7 · CTA −16 · Trust −16View →
  3. Apr 22, 202676First tracked report — strongest CTA 84, weakest Trust 64View →

Trust

58Fair

Proof that the product is real, competent, and safe to try.

Foreman
JobTread
Togal.AI
Trust read
ForemanCustomer logo strip (Energize Builders, Kash, MDRN Construction, NA Design Builders, Pacific Crest, Danbuilt) at the bot
Houzz Proimplicit context Houzz Pro may benefit from pre-existing familiarity among its target audience.
JobTreadTrusted by 13,000+ Construction Businesses
CoConstruct"A Buildertrend Company" logo lockup in the header
HandoffProduct UI screenshot of estimate "Bathroom Remodel - Full Gut" showing "63 items from 3 catalogs" with itemized line it
Togal.AI"Trusted every day by thousands of professional builders." strip above the customer logo row

Value props

68Fair

Title, subtitle, hero — do they sell the product's true value?

Foreman’s headline vagueAI to run every project from bid to built.

Working

  • "Bid to built" nails the full lifecycle
  • Hero shows real takeoff and budget UI
  • Customer logo strip adds social proof

Could improve

  • No subhead to explain what it does
  • Zero specific numbers or outcomes
  • "AI to run every project" is generic

Information hierarchy

72Fair

Does the design help or inhibit what the page is trying to say?

Information hierarchy annotations on the desktop capture1234
  1. Get Demo nav button — Same orange weight as the hero's Book a Demo, splitting the primary action across two competing buttons (plus Sign Up beside it).
  2. Headline over blueprint — Dense blueprint linework runs directly behind the white headline, degrading legibility of the core promise.
  3. Nav dropdown cluster — Three dropdowns plus Pricing and Login create seven-plus exits before the visitor reaches the demo CTA.
  4. Customer logo strip — Logos are low-contrast and half-cropped against the blueprint, adding visual noise instead of readable proof.

CTA

72Fair

Copy, size, verb, cost-feel — does the primary CTA earn the click?

Foreman
Handoff

Problems

  • 'Book' feels costly and committal
  • work-email gate raises click price
  • nav says 'Get Demo', hero 'Book a Demo'
  • three labels: Get Demo/Sign Up/Book a Demo

Mobile web

74Fair

The phone experience as a first-class citizen.

Mobile web annotations on the mobile capture12
  1. Headline over table — White headline overlaps dark table text with no scrim, so both layers fight for legibility.
  2. Email input overlap — The email field sits directly on top of table rows ('Relocate load-bearing wall'), reading as a broken layer rather than a form.