WeaveYC W25 landing page report.
← Back to YC W25
Weavehttps://weaveos.com/

Your landing page’s weakest score is CTA.

How Weave ranks

  1. 1.Swarmia73
  2. 2.Faros AI71
  3. 3.DX68
  4. 4.Jellyfish66
  5. 5.Weave64
  6. 6.LinearB64
Fix CTA
64Growth scoreupdated

category scores

CTA58Information hierarchy62Trust62Mobile web68Value props72
category scoresShowHide
CTA58Information hierarchy62Trust62Mobile web68Value props72

Score over time

8070605040Jellyfish 66 on Apr 5 (Wayback)Jellyfish 64 on Apr 21 (Wayback)Jellyfish 64 on May 4 (Wayback)Jellyfish 65 on Jun 5 (Wayback)Jellyfish 65 on Sep 4 (Wayback)Jellyfish 66 on Sep 20 (Live)LinearB 64 on Sep 20 (Live)DX 67 on May 21 (Wayback)DX 69 on Jun 22 (Wayback)DX 69 on Jul 24 (Wayback)DX 70 on Aug 2 (Wayback)DX 70 on Aug 25 (Wayback)DX 67 on Sep 3 (Wayback)DX 68 on Sep 20 (Live)Faros AI 73 on Apr 4 (Wayback)Faros AI 47 on Apr 15 (Wayback)Faros AI 71 on May 4 (Wayback)Faros AI 72 on Jun 28 (Wayback)Faros AI 70 on Aug 6 (Wayback)Faros AI 72 on Sep 6 (Wayback)Faros AI 71 on Sep 20 (Live)Swarmia 70 on Apr 2 (Wayback)Swarmia 74 on Apr 18 (Wayback)Swarmia 72 on May 6 (Wayback)Swarmia 72 on May 21 (Wayback)Swarmia 70 on Jun 14 (Wayback)Swarmia 73 on Jul 27 (Wayback)Swarmia 73 on Sep 20 (Live)Weave 59 on Aug 4 (Wayback)Weave 61 on Aug 28 (Wayback)Weave 64 on Sep 21 (Live)Aug 4Aug 28Sep 21
Past reportsShow past reportsHide past reports
  1. Sep 21, 202664LiveOverall +3 · Mobile web +16 · CTA −14Viewing
  2. Aug 28, 202661Overall +2 · Information hierarchy +20 · Value props −8View →
  3. Aug 4, 202659First tracked report — strongest CTA 74, weakest Information hierarchy 52View →

CTA

58Fair

Copy, size, verb, cost-feel — does the primary CTA earn the click?

Weave
Swarmia
Jellyfish
LinearB
DX
Faros AI

Problems

  • demo booking feels costly
  • free CTA hidden on desktop fold
  • labels differ desktop vs mobile
  • no hero CTA on desktop fold

Information hierarchy

62Fair

Does the design help or inhibit what the page is trying to say?

Information hierarchy annotations on the desktop capture1234
  1. Hero mascot illustration — The yarn mascot scene occupies the entire upper half of the fold, pushing the headline and both CTAs below the visitor's first scan.
  2. Book a Demo button — The only visible desktop CTA sits at the far top-right corner, outside the centered scan path of the headline and hero.
  3. Navigation link row — Six nav items plus a GitHub star count and Sign In offer eight exit paths before the value prop is even read.
  4. Weave Research banner — An announcement link sits directly above the hero, adding one more exit path that outranks the conversion action in scan order.

Trust

62Fair

Proof that the product is real, competent, and safe to try.

Weave
Swarmia
Trust read
Weave"Trusted by 500+ engineering organizations. Startups to Fortune 100" with Mastra and Spellbook logos
JellyfishProduct dashboard screenshot showing "AI Spend" metrics: "$4,583.14 cost per month" and "737,897,142 token usage per mon
LinearBimplicit context LinearB may benefit from pre-existing familiarity among its target audience.
DXCustomer logo strip under "POWERING THE WORLD'S TOP COMPANIES" (Fiserv, Indeed, ABInBev, Sony) visible in the mobile cap
Faros AICustomer logo strip: Autodesk, "TOP 5 US BANK", Riskified, Coursera, Discord
Swarmia"Swarmia named as a Leader in the 2026 Gartner® Magic Quadrant™ for Developer Productivity Insight Platforms"

Mobile web

68Fair

The phone experience as a first-class citizen.

Mobile web annotations on the mobile capture123
  1. Oversized hero illustration — The mascot art eats most of the first viewport, pushing both CTAs below the fold.
  2. Side-by-side CTA pair — Two desktop-sized buttons split the tap in a narrow column instead of one full-width primary.
  3. Weave Research banner — Announcement strip takes prime top-of-fold space and adds a competing tap before the value statement.

Value props

72Fair

Title, subtitle, hero — do they sell the product's true value?

Weave’s headline undersellsEngineering and token intelligence to optimize the SDLCWeave shows you the ROI of every AI dollar, benchmarked against thousands of engineering orgs.

Working

  • Subhead names concrete outcome: AI dollar ROI
  • Benchmark claim adds credible proof
  • Mobile shows 500+ orgs social proof

Could improve

  • H1 leans on jargon: 'token intelligence', 'SDLC'
  • Hero mascot decorates, shows no product
  • Real value buried in subhead, not H1

Competitors

inferred from product, audience, and value prop
#1Swarmiaswarmia.com73 #2Faros AIfaros.ai71 #3DXgetdx.com68 #4Jellyfishjellyfish.co66
#5Weave64
#6LinearBlinearb.io64