Revise RoboticsYC W25 landing page report.
← Back to YC W25

Your landing page’s weakest score is Trust.

How Revise Robotics ranks

  1. 1.AMP65
  2. 2.Molg61
  3. 3.Revise Robotics56
  4. 4.Glacier52
Fix Trust

Score over time

706560555045Molg 61 on Apr 6 (Wayback)Molg 61 on Apr 21 (Wayback)Molg 61 on May 10 (Wayback)Molg 60 on Jun 17 (Wayback)Molg 62 on Jul 9 (Wayback)Molg 62 on Aug 21 (Wayback)Molg 61 on Sep 23 (Live)Glacier 57 on Apr 10 (Wayback)Glacier 52 on Sep 20 (Live)AMP 65 on May 4 (Wayback)AMP 64 on May 20 (Wayback)AMP 62 on Jun 17 (Wayback)AMP 64 on Jun 24 (Wayback)AMP 64 on Jul 6 (Wayback)AMP 64 on Aug 10 (Wayback)AMP 65 on Sep 23 (Live)Revise Robotics 58 on Apr 19 (Wayback)Revise Robotics 56 on Sep 23 (Live)Apr 19Sep 23
Past reportsShow past reportsHide past reports
  1. Sep 23, 202656LiveOverall −2 · Mobile web +20 · Information hierarchy −16Viewing
  2. Apr 19, 202658First tracked report — strongest Information hierarchy 68, weakest CTA 52View →

Trust

48Poor

Proof that the product is real, competent, and safe to try.

Revise Robotics
Molg
Glacier
Trust read
Revise Robotics"Backed by Y Combinator" badge in the footer
MolgPartner logo bar "Partnering to drive circularity at scale" featuring HP, ABB, Dell Technologies, Sims Lifecycle Service
Glacier"Glacier has been named one of FAST COMPANY'S MOST INNOVATIVE COMPANIES of 2026" announcement bar
AMPNo visible trust signal identified.

Information hierarchy

52Fair

Does the design help or inhibit what the page is trying to say?

Information hierarchy annotations on the desktop capture1
  1. Headline cut off — 'Automating Refurbishment with AI and Robotics' is clipped at the bottom edge, so the value prop is not fully readable in the first viewport.

Value props

52Fair

Title, subtitle, hero — do they sell the product's true value?

Revise Robotics’s headline vagueAutomating Refurbishment with AI and Robotics

Working

  • Names the real domain: refurbishment
  • Honest — no inflated abstraction
  • Mobile hero shows robot handling laptop

Could improve

  • No subhead adds any specifics
  • Zero numbers or outcomes
  • Desktop hero is decorative office shot

CTA

55Fair

Copy, size, verb, cost-feel — does the primary CTA earn the click?

Book a Demo
Revise Robotics
AMP

Problems

  • no CTA in desktop fold
  • ghost style blends into video
  • demo booking feels costly
  • competes with Contact Us twice

Mobile web

72Fair

The phone experience as a first-class citizen.

Mobile web annotations on the mobile capture123
  1. Hero CTA pair — Two same-weight outline buttons with low contrast on a busy photo; no clear primary action.
  2. Uncollapsed nav links — Desktop link row kept on mobile instead of a hamburger, duplicating Contact Us from the hero.
  3. Ready to Revise CTA — Third Contact Us instance sized like a desktop button, not thumb-friendly full width.

Competitors

inferred from product, audience, and value prop