OutlitYC W25 landing page report.
← Back to YC W25

Your landing page’s weakest score is Trust.

Fix Trust

Score over time

80706050Vitally 75 on Apr 14 (Wayback)Vitally 74 on Apr 23 (Wayback)Vitally 74 on May 4 (Wayback)Vitally 77 on Jun 15 (Wayback)Vitally 74 on Jun 22 (Wayback)Vitally 75 on Sep 21 (Live)Catalyst (Totango + Catalyst) 65 on Apr 1 (Wayback)Catalyst (Totango + Catalyst) 67 on May 16 (Wayback)Catalyst (Totango + Catalyst) 65 on Jun 14 (Wayback)Catalyst (Totango + Catalyst) 66 on Jul 6 (Wayback)Catalyst (Totango + Catalyst) 64 on Aug 21 (Wayback)Catalyst (Totango + Catalyst) 58 on Sep 15 (Wayback)Catalyst (Totango + Catalyst) 57 on Sep 21 (Live)Gainsight 71 on Sep 21 (Live)Planhat 62 on Apr 3 (Wayback)Planhat 64 on Apr 13 (Wayback)Planhat 63 on May 16 (Wayback)Planhat 64 on Jun 16 (Wayback)Planhat 64 on Jul 10 (Wayback)Planhat 67 on Jul 27 (Wayback)Planhat 67 on Sep 21 (Live)ChurnZero 63 on Apr 9 (Wayback)ChurnZero 63 on May 21 (Wayback)ChurnZero 63 on Jun 30 (Wayback)ChurnZero 63 on Aug 1 (Wayback)ChurnZero 63 on Aug 10 (Wayback)ChurnZero 64 on Aug 30 (Wayback)ChurnZero 68 on Sep 21 (Live)Outlit 74 on Apr 4 (Wayback)Outlit 70 on May 21 (Wayback)Outlit 71 on Jun 4 (Wayback)Outlit 68 on Sep 21 (Live)Apr 4May 21Jun 4Sep 21
Past reportsShow past reportsHide past reports
  1. Sep 21, 202668LiveOverall −3 · Information hierarchy −16 · Value props +14Viewing
  2. Jun 4, 202671Overall +1 · Information hierarchy +6 · CTA +2View →
  3. May 21, 202670Overall −4 · CTA −16 · Value props −6View →
  4. Apr 4, 202674First tracked report — strongest CTA 84, weakest Trust 62View →

Trust

48Poor

Proof that the product is real, competent, and safe to try.

Outlit
Vitally
Gainsight
Trust read
Outlit"Backed by Y Combinator" badge above the hero headline
VitallyG2 badge with "4.5 based on 700+ Reviews" directly under the hero CTAs
Catalyst (Totango + Catalyst)"After over 15 years as a leader in Customer Success" longevity claim in the hero subhead
GainsightCustomer logo wall (Docusign, Figma, Google, Notion, Sonos) under "Trusted by teams that take retention seriously"
PlanhatFRONTIER — WINNING POST SALES IN THE AGENTIC ERA — NOVEMBER 10 — LONDON event banner
ChurnZero"65% reduction in onboarding time" / "13x increase in CSM account coverage" / "21% increase in gross revenue retention"

Information hierarchy

68Fair

Does the design help or inhibit what the page is trying to say?

Information hierarchy annotations on the desktop capture123
  1. Analytics consent banner — Full-width consent card with white 'Accept analytics' button matches the primary CTA styling and steals the bottom third of the fold.
  2. See a demo duplicate — Header 'See a demo' pill competes at equal white-button weight with the hero CTA, splitting the one action across two locations.
  3. Feature card stack — Three same-weight cards ('Adoption kept on track', 'Renewals protected early', 'Expansion moved forward') shout simultaneously with no visual ranking.

CTA

72Fair

Copy, size, verb, cost-feel — does the primary CTA earn the click?

Outlit
Vitally

Problems

  • demo framing feels like a sales call
  • "under 30 minutes" promise not in label
  • no self-serve or in-product path

Mobile web

72Fair

The phone experience as a first-class citizen.

Mobile web annotations on the mobile capture12
  1. Analytics consent banner — Dead blocker eats the bottom third of the fold with two full-width buttons that outsize the real CTA.
  2. See a demo button — Desktop-proportioned pill floating in the column; should be a near-full-width thumb target.

Value props

78Fair

Title, subtitle, hero — do they sell the product's true value?

Outlit’s headline sellsOne agent to retain and grow every account.Outlit is an AI agent for customer success teams, monitoring every account and taking action across onboarding, retention, and expansion.

Working

  • Outcome-led headline: retain and grow
  • Subhead names the buyer and the job
  • Proof cards map to lifecycle stages

Could improve

  • No metrics backing retention claims
  • Cards tell, hero never shows product
  • "Every account" is broad, unproven