RobocurveYC S26 landing page report.
← Back to YC S26
Robocurvehttps://robocurve.org/

Your landing page’s weakest score is CTA.

How Robocurve ranks

  1. 1.Epoch AI76
  2. 2.Robocurve74
  3. 3.METR73
  4. 4.Artificial Analysis65
  5. 5.Physical Intelligence Benchmarks (Scale AI)61
Fix CTA
74Growth scoreupdated

category scores

CTA64Trust72Value props76Information hierarchy78Mobile web82
category scoresShowHide
CTA64Trust72Value props76Information hierarchy78Mobile web82

Score over time

8070605040Physical Intelligence Benchmarks (Scale AI) 62 on May 30 (Wayback)Physical Intelligence Benchmarks (Scale AI) 62 on Jun 15 (Wayback)Physical Intelligence Benchmarks (Scale AI) 49 on Jul 11 (Wayback)Physical Intelligence Benchmarks (Scale AI) 64 on Aug 23 (Wayback)Physical Intelligence Benchmarks (Scale AI) 62 on Sep 5 (Wayback)Physical Intelligence Benchmarks (Scale AI) 61 on Sep 20 (Live)Epoch AI 72 on Jun 16 (Wayback)Epoch AI 72 on Jul 6 (Wayback)Epoch AI 74 on Jul 26 (Wayback)Epoch AI 71 on Aug 6 (Wayback)Epoch AI 74 on Aug 14 (Wayback)Epoch AI 74 on Sep 5 (Wayback)Epoch AI 76 on Sep 20 (Live)METR 72 on Jun 28 (Wayback)METR 75 on Jul 13 (Wayback)METR 72 on Jul 25 (Wayback)METR 73 on Aug 6 (Wayback)METR 72 on Aug 21 (Wayback)METR 72 on Sep 7 (Wayback)METR 73 on Sep 20 (Live)Artificial Analysis 58 on Jun 28 (Wayback)Artificial Analysis 64 on Jul 12 (Wayback)Artificial Analysis 66 on Jul 26 (Wayback)Artificial Analysis 66 on Aug 9 (Wayback)Artificial Analysis 64 on Aug 22 (Wayback)Artificial Analysis 64 on Sep 6 (Wayback)Artificial Analysis 65 on Sep 20 (Live)Robocurve 65 on Aug 1 (Wayback)Robocurve 75 on Sep 6 (Wayback)Robocurve 74 on Sep 20 (Live)Aug 1Sep 6Sep 20
Past reportsShow past reportsHide past reports
  1. Sep 20, 202674LiveOverall −1 · Value props +4 · Mobile web −4Viewing
  2. Sep 6, 202675Overall +10 · Mobile web +28 · CTA +12View →
  3. Aug 1, 202665First tracked report — strongest Value props 78, weakest CTA 52View →

CTA

64Fair

Copy, size, verb, cost-feel — does the primary CTA earn the click?

Robocurve
Physical Intelligence Benchmarks (Scale AI)
Epoch AI

Problems

  • click feels costly — asks for a call
  • no value promised for the click
  • 'Talk' is a weak action verb

Trust

72Fair

Proof that the product is real, competent, and safe to try.

Robocurve
Epoch AI
METR
Trust read
Robocurve"Backed by Y Combinator" badge above the hero headline
Physical Intelligence Benchmarks (Scale AI)implicit context Physical Intelligence Benchmarks (Scale AI) may benefit from pre-existing familiarity among its target audience.
Epoch AI"Trusted by leading publications and institutions" logo strip (Our World in Data, DSIT, Government of the Netherlands, N
METR"Non-public information and model access provided by:" with Anthropic, Google DeepMind, Meta, and OpenAI logos on the Fr
Artificial AnalysisLive benchmark charts ("Intelligence", "Speed", "Cost per Task") comparing named models with specific scores

Value props

76Fair

Title, subtitle, hero — do they sell the product's true value?

Robocurve’s headline sellsReal-world evaluations of physical AIWe measure and report frontier robotics capabilities to the public.

Working

  • Honest, concrete category claim
  • Benchmark cards prove the work live
  • Robot-arm hero shows the product doing its job

Could improve

  • No numbers: tests run, models covered
  • Subhead restates the headline
  • No emotional stakes for the audience

Information hierarchy

78Fair

Does the design help or inhibit what the page is trying to say?

Information hierarchy annotations on the desktop capture1234
  1. Three benchmark cards — Three dense chart cards enter the fold at equal weight, forcing the eye to arbitrate before the hero message lands.
  2. LLM speed chart — Tiny multi-series labels (Mercury 2, Gemini, Claude Fable 5) are illegible at fold size and add pure noise.
  3. Scatter plot legend — Four-item legend plus in-chart callouts ask for analysis work the fold should not demand.
  4. Duplicate Talk to us — Nav button repeats the hero CTA at identical weight, splitting attention between two targets for one action.

Mobile web

82Strong

The phone experience as a first-class citizen.

Mobile web annotations on the mobile capture12
  1. Header Talk to us — Duplicates the hero CTA inside the collapsed nav, crowding the hamburger and splitting attention.
  2. Why it matters button — Ghost button sits at equal weight beside the primary CTA, diluting the single tap decision.

Competitors

inferred from product, audience, and value prop
#1Epoch AIepoch.ai76
#2Robocurve74
#3METRmetr.org73 #4Artificial Analysisartificialanalysis.ai65 #5Physical Intelligence Benchmarks (Scale AI)scale.com61