Apollo Atomics, Inc.YC P26 landing page report.
← Back to YC P26
Apollo Atomics, Inc.https://apolloatomics.com/

Your landing page’s weakest score is Trust.

How Apollo Atomics, Inc. ranks

  1. 1.Radiant71
  2. 2.Apollo Atomics, Inc.69
  3. 3.Last Energy67
  4. 4.Aalo Atomics66
  5. 5.X-energy56
  6. 6.Oklo40
Fix Trust

Score over time

80706050403020Radiant 71 on Sep 23 (Live)Oklo 35 on Sep 2 (Wayback)Oklo 40 on Sep 20 (Live)Aalo Atomics 62 on Apr 19 (Wayback)Aalo Atomics 62 on May 6 (Wayback)Aalo Atomics 63 on May 20 (Wayback)Aalo Atomics 64 on Jun 7 (Wayback)Aalo Atomics 63 on Jun 18 (Wayback)Aalo Atomics 62 on Jun 30 (Wayback)Aalo Atomics 66 on Sep 23 (Live)Last Energy 72 on Apr 1 (Wayback)Last Energy 68 on May 1 (Wayback)Last Energy 70 on May 11 (Wayback)Last Energy 67 on Jun 5 (Wayback)Last Energy 69 on Jun 12 (Wayback)Last Energy 69 on Jul 10 (Wayback)Last Energy 67 on Sep 23 (Live)X-energy 49 on Jun 11 (Wayback)X-energy 48 on Jul 4 (Wayback)X-energy 57 on Jul 14 (Wayback)X-energy 56 on Jul 29 (Wayback)X-energy 57 on Aug 13 (Wayback)X-energy 56 on Sep 7 (Wayback)X-energy 56 on Sep 23 (Live)Apollo Atomics, Inc. 69 on Sep 20 (Live)Sep 20

Trust

44Poor

Proof that the product is real, competent, and safe to try.

Apollo Atomics, Inc.
Radiant
Aalo Atomics
Trust read
Apollo Atomics, Inc."Backed by Y" investor badge in the hero
Radiant"15 Microreactors | Largest Award Under Janus Program | One of the Largest Contracts Ever Issued by DIU"
Okloimplicit context Oklo may benefit from pre-existing familiarity among its target audience.
Aalo AtomicsVideo thumbnail showing a real reactor-core assembly, with a cleanroom technician handling hardware in the mobile hero
Last EnergyNo visible trust signal identified.
X-energyNo visible trust signal identified.

CTA

63Fair

Copy, size, verb, cost-feel — does the primary CTA earn the click?

Apollo Atomics, Inc.
Last Energy

Problems

  • generic contact ask, no value offered
  • click feels like a sales meeting
  • no echo of headline promise
  • no secondary lower-commitment path

Value props

76Fair

Title, subtitle, hero — do they sell the product's true value?

Apollo Atomics, Inc.’s headline sellsBuilding the Most Power-Dense Nuclear SystemClean. Compact. Highest Uptime. Deployed in Less Than 24 Months.

Working

  • Claims the real differentiator: power density
  • 24-month deployment is a concrete number
  • Hero shows the actual reactor, not stock art

Could improve

  • 'Most' and 'Highest' lack supporting specs
  • No power output or footprint figure
  • No buyer outcome (cost, energy delivered)

Mobile web

78Fair

The phone experience as a first-class citizen.

Mobile web annotations on the mobile capture12
  1. Oversized hero headline — Wraps to three huge lines and pushes the subhead and CTA to the bottom edge of the viewport.
  2. GET IN TOUCH button — Half-width pill pinned at the viewport's bottom edge; likely clipped below the fold on shorter phones.

Information hierarchy

82Strong

Does the design help or inhibit what the page is trying to say?

Information hierarchy annotations on the desktop capture123
  1. Duplicate GET IN TOUCH — Same-weight twin of the header pill splits the primary action into two equal targets.
  2. Detached subheadline — Key proof line sits bottom-right, disconnected from the headline it supports, breaking the scan path.
  3. Headline over render — Thin white type crosses the reactor's bright highlights, weakening legibility of the core promise.

Competitors

inferred from product, audience, and value prop