ClideyYC P25 landing page report.
← Back to YC P25

Your landing page’s weakest score is Trust.

Fix Trust

Score over time

908070605040DBeaver 53 on Jun 4 (Wayback)DBeaver 52 on Jun 20 (Wayback)DBeaver 54 on Jul 3 (Wayback)DBeaver 52 on Jul 17 (Wayback)DBeaver 54 on Aug 2 (Wayback)DBeaver 54 on Aug 13 (Wayback)DBeaver 54 on Aug 28 (Live)Beekeeper Studio 79 on Jun 15 (Wayback)Beekeeper Studio 81 on Jul 6 (Wayback)Beekeeper Studio 79 on Jul 28 (Wayback)Beekeeper Studio 79 on Aug 10 (Wayback)Beekeeper Studio 79 on Aug 25 (Wayback)Beekeeper Studio 80 on Sep 17 (Wayback)Beekeeper Studio 80 on Sep 21 (Live)TablePlus 74 on Jun 7 (Wayback)TablePlus 72 on Jun 20 (Wayback)TablePlus 73 on Jul 6 (Wayback)TablePlus 74 on Jul 16 (Wayback)TablePlus 72 on Jul 31 (Wayback)TablePlus 73 on Aug 16 (Wayback)TablePlus 72 on Aug 28 (Live)Adminer 60 on Jun 10 (Wayback)Adminer 61 on Jun 17 (Wayback)Adminer 61 on Jun 26 (Wayback)Adminer 59 on Jul 26 (Wayback)Adminer 58 on Aug 26 (Wayback)Adminer 63 on Sep 4 (Wayback)Adminer 62 on Sep 21 (Live)Clidey 65 on Jun 6 (Wayback)Clidey 65 on Jun 24 (Wayback)Clidey 63 on Sep 21 (Live)Jun 6Jun 24Sep 21
Past reportsShow past reportsHide past reports
  1. Sep 21, 202663LiveOverall −2 · Trust −14 · Value props +10Viewing
  2. Jun 24, 202665Value props −4 · Trust +4View →
  3. Jun 6, 202665First tracked report — strongest Information hierarchy 78, weakest Value props 52View →

Trust

42Poor

Proof that the product is real, competent, and safe to try.

Clidey
Beekeeper Studio
DBeaver
TablePlus
Adminer
Trust read
ClideyGitHub link in the navigation signaling open-source code
DBeaverGitHub star counter showing "Star 51,574"
Beekeeper Studio"Trusted by teams at" logo row with NHS, NVIDIA, Sony, BBC, Delta, LinkedIn, Hitachi, HP
TablePlusReal product screenshot of the database GUI shown on laptop and phone mockups
Adminer"Screenshots" section showing twelve real product UI captures (login, table structure, export dialogs)

Value props

58Fair

Title, subtitle, hero — do they sell the product's true value?

Clidey’s headline vagueBuilding software that brings clarity to your data.Clidey is the company behind WhoDB and open-source developer tools. We build modern data infrastructure that helps engineering and data teams operate with complete confidence.

Working

  • Names an outcome: clarity from data
  • Subhead names WhoDB and the audience
  • Emotional note: complete confidence

Could improve

  • Headline could caption any data tool
  • No numbers or proof points anywhere
  • Empty hero space; no product shown

Mobile web

64Fair

The phone experience as a first-class citizen.

Mobile web annotations on the mobile capture123
  1. Six-line hero headline — Headline barely scaled down from desktop and wraps into six tall lines, eating most of the first viewport.
  2. Explore WhoDB button — Primary CTA sits at the bottom edge at half-column width instead of a thumb-friendly full-bleed button.
  3. Five-line body paragraph — Long intro paragraph stacks under the oversized headline and helps push both CTAs to the fold's edge.

CTA

72Fair

Copy, size, verb, cost-feel — does the primary CTA earn the click?

Clidey
Beekeeper Studio
TablePlus

Problems

  • 'Explore' is vague, no outcome
  • no 'free' despite open source
  • doesn't echo 'clarity' promise

Information hierarchy

78Fair

Does the design help or inhibit what the page is trying to say?

Information hierarchy annotations on the desktop capture123
  1. Nav link row — Four exits plus GitHub siphon attention before the primary CTA, and 'WhoDB' duplicates the button's destination.
  2. Browse open source button — Sits at equal size beside the primary CTA, splitting the single action into a two-way choice.
  3. GitHub nav link — Outbound exit placed at the top-right terminal scan position, the strongest secondary slot on the fold.