Your landing page’s weakest score is Information hierarchy.

How Beekeeper Studio ranks

  1. 1.Beekeeper Studio80
  2. 2.TablePlus72
  3. 3.Clidey63
  4. 4.Adminer62
  5. 5.DBeaver54
Fix Information hierarchy
80Growth scoreupdated

category scores

category scoresShowHide

Information hierarchy

76Fair

Does the design help or inhibit what the page is trying to say?

Information hierarchy annotations on the desktop capture1234
  1. Header Download button — Duplicates the hero's Download Free at equal yellow weight, splitting the primary action's authority.
  2. GitHub star widget — An outbound exit sitting beside the header CTA, pulling clicks to GitHub before conversion.
  3. Seven-item nav row — Pricing, Features, Testimonials, Support, Account and language switcher create ten exit paths above the CTA.
  4. Video Walkthrough link — Cyan link at the CTA's eye level competes for the same click at near-equal visual pull.

Value props

76Fair

Title, subtitle, hero — do they sell the product's true value?

Beekeeper Studio’s headline sellsThe SQL Editor and Database Manager Of Your DreamsA modern, easy to use, and good looking SQL client for MySQL, Postgres, SQLite, SQL Server, Firebird, and more. Oh, it's also open source :-).

Working

  • Names category and 5 databases instantly
  • Open source stated up front
  • Real logos + 23,634 GitHub stars as proof

Could improve

  • 'Of Beekeeper Studio's Dreams' names no concrete outcome
  • No pain point or emotional contrast
  • No number quantifying a benefit

Trust

82Strong

Proof that the product is real, competent, and safe to try.

Beekeeper Studio desktop capture for Trust

How Beekeeper Studio compares

Trust read

Mobile web

82Strong

The phone experience as a first-class citizen.

Beekeeper Studio mobile capture for Mobile web

What works

What to improve

CTA

86Strong

Copy, size, verb, cost-feel — does the primary CTA earn the click?

Beekeeper Studio

How Beekeeper Studio compares

Recommended rewrites