Scott AIYC F25 landing page report.
← Back to YC F25

Your landing page’s weakest score is Trust.

How Scott AI ranks

  1. 1.Lightyear78
  2. 2.Scott AI66
  3. 3.Kojo66
  4. 4.Partsimony62
  5. 5.Raiven57
Fix Trust

Score over time

90807060504030Partsimony 62 on Sep 22 (Live)Kojo 67 on Apr 15 (Wayback)Kojo 67 on May 17 (Wayback)Kojo 66 on Jul 17 (Wayback)Kojo 66 on Aug 20 (Wayback)Kojo 66 on Sep 22 (Live)Raiven 43 on Apr 22 (Wayback)Raiven 52 on May 1 (Wayback)Raiven 46 on Aug 14 (Wayback)Raiven 48 on Sep 2 (Wayback)Raiven 57 on Sep 22 (Live)Lightyear 78 on Sep 22 (Live)Scott AI 61 on Apr 10 (Wayback)Scott AI 66 on Sep 22 (Live)Apr 10Sep 22
Past reportsShow past reportsHide past reports
  1. Sep 22, 202666LiveOverall +5 · Value props +26 · CTA −14Viewing
  2. Apr 10, 202661First tracked report — strongest CTA 72, weakest Trust 42View →

Trust

52Fair

Proof that the product is real, competent, and safe to try.

Scott AI
Lightyear
Kojo
Raiven
Trust read
Scott AIiMessage demo showing a delayed 1/2-inch PEX-to-PEX valve order with Amazon and SupplyHouse substitute carts
PartsimonyAnnotated component breakdown visual with callouts like "COMPONENT 53 — FABRICATION, EST COST: $207, MFG A IN FRANCE"
KojoIndustry association logo bar (NECA, MCAA, ABC Tech Alliance, CFMA, SMACNA, IEC) below the hero
RaivenQuote Comparison product UI showing line-item supplier prices and lead times, with mobile screen comparing $1,198.07 vs
Lightyear"Regulated by EFSA" badge paired with "4.7 on Trustpilot" above the headline

CTA

58Fair

Copy, size, verb, cost-feel — does the primary CTA earn the click?

Scott AI
Kojo
Lightyear
Partsimony

Problems

  • label is a phone number, no verb
  • texting feels high-effort
  • nav 'GET STARTED' inconsistent
  • value payoff not on the button

Mobile web

64Fair

The phone experience as a first-class citizen.

Mobile web annotations on the mobile capture12
  1. SMS consent paragraph — Seven lines of compliance text sit directly under the CTAs, pushing the phone-demo proof far below the fold.
  2. Email CTA button — Duplicate secondary action stacked below the phone button splits the tap decision in the first viewport.

Information hierarchy

78Fair

Does the design help or inhibit what the page is trying to say?

Information hierarchy annotations on the desktop capture123
  1. Three equal-blue CTAs — Nav GET STARTED, phone button, and email button share weight, splitting the primary action three ways.
  2. SMS consent paragraph — Five lines of legalese sit directly under the CTAs, adding friction to the scan path at the decision moment.
  3. Uneven headline underline — The two blue underline strokes break mid-word and misalign, making the headline read as visually glitched.

Value props

78Fair

Title, subtitle, hero — do they sell the product's true value?

Scott AI’s headline sellsSuperhuman buyer for specialty vehicle partsOur expert team of buyers uses AI tools to source the parts you need at the best prices and with the shortest lead times. We handle everything from spec to delivery.

Working

  • Names a precise niche and buyer role
  • Hero image demonstrates real workflow
  • Outcome framed: spec to delivery

Could improve

  • "Best prices" is unquantified
  • No proof points or metrics in fold
  • "Superhuman" leans on hype

Competitors

inferred from product, audience, and value prop