EverestYC F25 landing page report.
← Back to YC F25

Your landing page’s weakest score is Trust.

Fix Trust

Score over time

9080706050LLMLingua (Microsoft) 56 on May 15 (Wayback)LLMLingua (Microsoft) 54 on Jun 14 (Wayback)LLMLingua (Microsoft) 54 on Jul 8 (Wayback)LLMLingua (Microsoft) 55 on Sep 20 (Live)Requesty 76 on Apr 1 (Wayback)Requesty 74 on Apr 28 (Wayback)Requesty 71 on Jun 28 (Wayback)Requesty 67 on Jul 14 (Wayback)Requesty 71 on Jul 25 (Wayback)Requesty 69 on Aug 25 (Wayback)Requesty 76 on Sep 10 (Live)OpenRouter 79 on Jul 3 (Wayback)OpenRouter 79 on Jul 17 (Wayback)OpenRouter 78 on Jul 31 (Wayback)OpenRouter 76 on Aug 14 (Wayback)OpenRouter 77 on Aug 28 (Wayback)OpenRouter 78 on Sep 8 (Wayback)OpenRouter 77 on Sep 10 (Live)Portkey 72 on Jul 28 (Wayback)Portkey 58 on Aug 7 (Wayback)Portkey 56 on Aug 28 (Wayback)Portkey 55 on Sep 6 (Wayback)Portkey 61 on Sep 10 (Live)Portkey 55 on Sep 22 (Wayback)Portkey 54 on Oct 10 (Wayback)Everest 68 on Sep 22 (Live)Sep 22

Trust

58Fair

Proof that the product is real, competent, and safe to try.

Everest
OpenRouter
Portkey
LLMLingua (Microsoft)
Trust read
Everest"benchmarked on DeepSWE" panel showing cost $0.412 → $0.243 (-41%) and latency 6.9s → 6.2s (-10%)
LLMLingua (Microsoft)Author list with "Microsoft Corporation" affiliation and {hjiang, qianhuiwu, xufang.luo}@microsoft.com emails plus linke
RequestyDetailed analytics dashboard screenshot showing "Sum of Cost by Model Over Time — $445.95" with per-model usage table (o
OpenRouterStat bar: "400T+ Monthly Tokens · 10M+ Global Users · 80+ Providers · 500+ Models"
Portkey"A PALO ALTO NETWORKS COMPANY" tag under the Portkey logo

Mobile web

58Fair

The phone experience as a first-class citizen.

Mobile web annotations on the mobile capture123
  1. Compression feature box — Bullet text 'optimized for achieving the' is cut off at the right edge — the box overflows the viewport horizontally.
  2. Truncated curl command — The install command 'curl -fsSL https://install.ev…' is clipped mid-URL, undermining trust in the one-click install pitch.
  3. Start with $30 credit — The primary CTA sits far below the first viewport as small right-aligned bracketed text instead of a full-width tappable button.

CTA

68Fair

Copy, size, verb, cost-feel — does the primary CTA earn the click?

Everestin-product action
Requesty
OpenRouter

Problems

  • '[ COPY ]' promises no payoff
  • $30 credit offer buried bottom-right
  • command truncated on mobile
  • no benefit copy near submit

Information hierarchy

76Fair

Does the design help or inhibit what the page is trying to say?

Information hierarchy annotations on the desktop capture123
  1. Start with $30 credit — The likely conversion CTA is stranded bottom-right in low-emphasis bracket styling, outside the scan path and weaker than the [ COPY ] button.
  2. Two equal terminal panels — The compression panel and DeepSWE benchmark box sit at identical visual weight, so the strongest proof (-41% cost) doesn't outrank the feature list.
  3. Benchmark delta labels — The -41% and -10% savings — the core promise — are rendered at the same small mono size as row labels instead of being the loudest numbers on the page.

Value props

78Fair

Title, subtitle, hero — do they sell the product's true value?

Everest’s headline sellseverest saves your bills on the best closed-source models for coding.

Working

  • Names real outcome: lower model bills
  • Hard numbers: -41% cost, -10% latency
  • Hero demos the product, not decoration

Could improve

  • No subhead translating how it works
  • Jargon bullets: BYOK, intent-based compression
  • 'saves Everest's bills' phrasing is awkward

Competitors

inferred from product, audience, and value prop