Your landing page’s weakest score is Trust.
How Violentmonkey ranks
- 1.
Tweeks.io80
- 2.
uBlock Origin68
- 3.
Violentmonkey64
- 4.
Stylus42
- 5.
Tampermonkey40
category scores
category scoresShowHide
Trust
48PoorProof that the product is real, competent, and safe to try.



| Trust read | |
|---|---|
| Violentmonkey | "NOTE: Violentmonkey in Chrome Web Store has been updated to ManifestV3." |
| "25k+ people tweeking sites / 4k+ public tweeks / 4M+ pages modified" stats bar with "5.0 ★★★★★ Chrome Web Store" rating | |
| "Over a hundred developers have embraced our platform" with named integrations (addons.mozilla.org, github.com, sourcefo | |
| Availability links for Chrome, Microsoft Edge, Safari, Opera Next, and Firefox implying official store distribution | |
| Product screenshot of the extension popup showing "Blocked on this page 42 (22%)" and "Blocked since install 1.061M (11% |
Value props
58FairTitle, subtitle, hero — do they sell the product's true value?
Violentmonkey
An open source userscript manager.
Working
- Honest category label, no hype
- "Open source" builds trust
- Concrete sync services named below
Could improve
- Assumes reader knows 'userscript'
- Zero numbers or proof points
- Mascot hero shows nothing
Mobile web
70FairThe phone experience as a first-class citizen.

What works
What to improve
CTA
72FairCopy, size, verb, cost-feel — does the primary CTA earn the click?

How Violentmonkey compares
Recommended rewrites
Information hierarchy
74FairDoes the design help or inhibit what the page is trying to say?

What works
What to improve
