Your landing page’s weakest score is Value props.
How Stylus ranks
category scores
category scoresShowHide
Value props
28PoorTitle, subtitle, hero — do they sell the product's true value?
Open-Source Application Development
provides free consultation and application hosting for all major web browsers (Chrome, Firefox, Edge, Safari, Opera and Vivaldi) and mobile platforms (iOS and Android)
Working
- Lists supported browsers concretely
- Says 'free' up front
- 'Over a hundred developers' proof point
Could improve
- Never names Stylus or its function
- Headline could caption any dev site
- 'Review' CTA has zero context
Trust
38PoorProof that the product is real, competent, and safe to try.





| Trust read | |
|---|---|
| Stylus | "Over a hundred developers have embraced our platform" with named integrations (addons.mozilla.org, github.com, sourcefo |
| "25k+ people tweeking sites / 4k+ public tweeks / 4M+ pages modified" stats bar with "5.0 ★★★★★ Chrome Web Store" rating | |
| Availability links for Chrome, Microsoft Edge, Safari, Opera Next, and Firefox implying official store distribution | |
| "NOTE: Violentmonkey in Chrome Web Store has been updated to ManifestV3." | |
| Product screenshot of the extension popup showing "Blocked on this page 42 (22%)" and "Blocked since install 1.061M (11% |
Information hierarchy
42PoorDoes the design help or inhibit what the page is trying to say?

What works
What to improve
CTA
48PoorCopy, size, verb, cost-feel — does the primary CTA earn the click?

How Stylus compares
Recommended rewrites
Mobile web
54FairThe phone experience as a first-class citizen.

What works
What to improve
