SuperTokenshttps://supertokens.com/

Your landing page’s weakest score is Trust.

How SuperTokens ranks

  1. 1.Clerk80
  2. 2.Supabase Auth76
  3. 3.Better Auth74
  4. 4.Auth.js (NextAuth.js)70
  5. 5.SuperTokens67
  6. 6.Lucia41
Fix Trust
67Growth scoreupdated

category scores

Trust62Mobile web62
category scoresShowHide
Trust62Mobile web62

Trust

62Fair

Proof that the product is real, competent, and safe to try.

SuperTokens
Clerk
Better Auth
Auth.js (NextAuth.js)
Trust read
SuperTokensGitHub star count badge showing 15316
Better Auth"TRUSTED BY" logo strip featuring Vercel, strapi, beatBread, Artlist, sim, supermemory, and Axiom
Auth.js (NextAuth.js)Code sample panel showing "import NextAuth from \"next-auth\"" with framework tabs, plus the GitHub badge reading "28.4k
Clerk"Trusted by fast-growing companies around the world" logo strip (Inngest, Durable, Upstash, Cartesia)
Luciagithub.com/lucia-auth/lucia source link with named maintainer "Pilcrow"
Supabase Auth"110K" GitHub star count in the desktop navigation

Mobile web

62Fair

The phone experience as a first-class citizen.

Mobile web annotations on the mobile capture123
  1. npx command box — Sole fold CTA is a terminal command a phone visitor cannot run; no tappable button alternative.
  2. Copy clipboard icon — Tiny icon with no label or copied-state affordance; unclear it is tappable at thumb size.
  3. Trusted-by heading — Faded low-contrast text cut off at the fold with no visible logos backing the claim.

CTA

68Fair

Copy, size, verb, cost-feel — does the primary CTA earn the click?

SuperTokensin-product action

How SuperTokens compares

Recommended rewrites

Value props

70Fair

Title, subtitle, hero — do they sell the product's true value?

SuperTokens’s headlineOpen Source User AuthenticationBuild fast. Maintain control. Reduce costs.

Working

Could improve

Information hierarchy

72Fair

Does the design help or inhibit what the page is trying to say?

SuperTokens desktop capture for Information hierarchy

What works

What to improve