Pharos iBio / Standigmhttps://standigm.com/

Your landing page’s weakest score is Trust.

How Pharos iBio / Standigm ranks

  1. 1.Recursion66
  2. 2.Atlas Discovery54
  3. 3.Insilico Medicine54
  4. 4.Pharos iBio / Standigm50
  5. 5.Every Cure46
  6. 6.Healx46
Fix Trust
50Growth scoreupdated

category scores

Trust38CTA44
category scoresShowHide
Trust38CTA44

Trust

38Poor

Proof that the product is real, competent, and safe to try.

Insilico Medicine
Recursion
Atlas Discovery
Every Cure
Trust read
Pharos iBio / StandigmNo visible trust signal identified.
Atlas Discovery"Backed by — YCombinator" table row
Insilico MedicinePipeline table rows showing "Out-licensed to Exelixis" and "Out-licensed to Menarini" with Phase I–III progress bars and
RecursionUnlocking the First Neuroscience Target for the Recursion and Genentech Collaboration
Every CurePhotograph of a clinician consulting with a hospital patient behind the hero headline
HealxNo visible trust signal identified.

CTA

44Poor

Copy, size, verb, cost-feel — does the primary CTA earn the click?

Pharos iBio / Standigm
Recursion
Every Cure

Problems

  • no CTA in hero, only nav corner
  • 'Contact Us' feels costly/sales-y
  • absent from mobile fold entirely
  • small footprint vs huge headline

Mobile web

44Poor

The phone experience as a first-class citizen.

Pharos iBio / Standigm mobile capture for Mobile web

What works

What to improve

Value props

62Fair

Title, subtitle, hero — do they sell the product's true value?

Pharos iBio / Standigm’s headlineStandigm pioneers in first-in-class target identification.Seeking groundbreaking targets for innovative therapies?

Working

Could improve

Information hierarchy

64Fair

Does the design help or inhibit what the page is trying to say?

Pharos iBio / Standigm desktop capture for Information hierarchy

What works

What to improve