Shortwavehttps://shortwave.com/

Your landing page’s weakest score is Trust.

How Shortwave ranks

  1. 1.Shortwave78
  2. 2.Missive76
  3. 3.Slashy73
  4. 4.Superhuman71
  5. 5.Fyxer71
Fix Trust
78Growth scoreupdated

category scores

Trust62Value props76
category scoresShowHide
Trust62Value props76

Trust

62Fair

Proof that the product is real, competent, and safe to try.

Trust read
Shortwave"Saw us in the New York Times?" press banner
SlashyDetailed product screenshot showing the Slashy inbox UI with an email thread and AI chat panel drafting a reply
SuperhumanRendered inbox UI with split tabs (Important 8, Calendar 18, Team 15, Docs 40) and an "Auto Draft to Karl" AI-composed r
FyxerProduct UI demo with INBOX/MEETINGS/PRIORITIES/ACTIONS tabs showing a real email tagged "To Respond" from Elena Marsh
Missive"6000+ companies rely on Missive every day" usage claim (mobile capture)

Value props

76Fair

Title, subtitle, hero — do they sell the product's true value?

Shortwave’s headline sellsAutomate your email with AISave hours each day with the Shortwave Agent — organize, schedule, write and search with just a prompt

Working

  • Prompt box demos the agent, not decoration
  • Subhead names four concrete capabilities
  • 'Save hours each day' states a real outcome

Could improve

  • Headline is generic across AI email tools
  • No hard numbers or user proof in the fold
  • No emotional hook for inbox overwhelm

CTA

82Strong

Copy, size, verb, cost-feel — does the primary CTA earn the click?

Shortwave

How Shortwave compares

Recommended rewrites

Information hierarchy

84Strong

Does the design help or inhibit what the page is trying to say?

Shortwave desktop capture for Information hierarchy

What works

What to improve

Mobile web

86Strong

The phone experience as a first-class citizen.

Shortwave mobile capture for Mobile web

What works

What to improve