Savahttps://www.savahq.com/

Your landing page’s weakest score is Value props.

How Sava ranks

  1. 1.Trust & Will78
  2. 2.Vanilla74
  3. 3.GoodTrust66
  4. 4.Sava62
  5. 5.Wealth.com62
Fix Value props
62Growth scoreupdated

category scores

Value props32Trust48
category scoresShowHide
Value props32Trust48

Value props

32Poor

Title, subtitle, hero — do they sell the product's true value?

Sava’s headline vagueBuilding the future of trusts.

Working

  • Names the category (trusts)
  • YC badge lends credibility
  • Short and clean, easy to read

Could improve

  • No subhead — zero specifics
  • Could caption any trust startup
  • No emotion, outcome, or proof

Trust

48Poor

Proof that the product is real, competent, and safe to try.

Sava
Trust & Will
Vanilla
GoodTrust
Wealth.com
Trust read
Sava"Backed by Y Combinator" badge
Wealth.comBanner: "Wealth.com is a launch partner for Claude for Financial Advisors."
Trust & WillTrustpilot "Excellent" star rating badge below the hero CTA
VanillaCustomer logo strip including Vanguard and Robinhood
GoodTrust"AS SEEN IN" press bar with BBC, CBS News, Fortune, WSJ, and NerdWallet logos

Information hierarchy

74Fair

Does the design help or inhibit what the page is trying to say?

Sava desktop capture for Information hierarchy

What works

What to improve

CTA

74Fair

Copy, size, verb, cost-feel — does the primary CTA earn the click?

Sava

How Sava compares

Recommended rewrites

Mobile web

84Strong

The phone experience as a first-class citizen.

Sava mobile capture for Mobile web

What works

What to improve