Your landing page’s weakest score is Trust.
How Pax Historia ranks
- 1.
AI Dungeon74
- 2.
Pax Historia62
- 3.
NationStates61
- 4.
Ages of Conflict44
62Growth scoreupdated
category scores
category scoresShowHide
Trust
28PoorProof that the product is real, competent, and safe to try.
| Trust read | |
|---|---|
| Pax Historia | No visible trust signal identified. |
| implicit context AI Dungeon may benefit from pre-existing familiarity among its target audience. | |
| "Ages of Conflict: World War Simulator" section with game key art and world-map simulation background | |
| 10,019,410 nations served! |
Value props
52FairTitle, subtitle, hero — do they sell the product's true value?
Pax Historia’s headline undersells
Welcome to Pax Historia
An alternate history sandbox game
Working
- Subhead names the genre plainly
- Alpha! badge sets honest expectations
- Single clear CTA, zero clutter
Could improve
- Headline is a greeting, not a value claim
- No emotion — the rewrite-history fantasy is absent
- Hero orb shows no gameplay or specifics
Information hierarchy
74FairDoes the design help or inhibit what the page is trying to say?
What works
What to improve
CTA
74FairCopy, size, verb, cost-feel — does the primary CTA earn the click?
How Pax Historia compares
Recommended rewrites
Mobile web
82StrongThe phone experience as a first-class citizen.
What works
What to improve